Wiretap biker kicks cops assets in court

Trooper Herr Uhler vs SSgt Anthony Graber

The Dragonator salutes you, Sargent Graber. Expect a big civil lawsuit settlement for false arrest and malicious prosecution, billed to the taxslaves, with ACLU lawyers keeping 90% of the taxmoney.

Note how the news cartel censored the full-text of the court order, since We The Sheeple are too stoopid to comprehend it -- or it made cops and prosecutors look like commienazi idiots.



Charges dismissed against Md. man who taped traffic stop

Washington Post

A Harford County Circuit Court judge Monday dismissed wiretapping charges against Anthony Graber, a motorcyclist who was jailed briefly after he taped a Maryland state trooper who stopped him for speeding on I-95. Graber used a camera mounted on his helmet, then posted the video on YouTube.

In April, a few weeks after the traffic stop, Harford County state's attorney Joseph I. Cassilly charged Graber, a staff sergeant in the Maryland Air National Guard and a computer systems engineer, with violating the state's wiretapping law. That law dates back to the 1970s and was originally intended to protect citizens from government intrusions into their privacy. If convicted on all charges, Graber faced up to 16 years in prison.

Judge Emory A. Pitt Jr. had to decide whether police performing their duties have an expectation of privacy in public space. Pitt ruled that police can have no such expectation in their public, on-the-job communications.

Pitt wrote: "Those of us who are public officials and are entrusted with the power of the state are ultimately accountable to the public. When we exercise that power in public fora, we should not expect our actions to be shielded from public observation. 'Sed quis custodiet ipsos cutodes' ("Who watches the watchmen?”)."

Graber was also charged with possessing a “device primarily useful for the purpose of the surreptitious interception of oral communications" -- referring to the video camera on his helmet. The judge disagreed with the prosecutor that the helmet cam was illegal, and concluded the state's argument would render illegal “almost every cell phone, Blackberry, and every similar device, not to mention dictation equipment and other types of recording devices."

Pitt's decision is the first ruling in Maryland to address the legality of citizens taping police in the course of their duties. Because it is a circuit court ruling, it is not binding on other judges. However, unless it is appealed, said Graber's attorney, David Rocah of the ACLU of Maryland, "it is likely to be the last word" on the matter and to be regarded as precedent by police.

See also:

MD Attorney General Opinion vs county prosecutors -- "While the Constitution constrains electronic surveilance by police, it does not constrain the actions of private individuals."

No word yet on whether the state's attorney will try to appeal the decision. Graber still faces traffic charges stemming from the incident.

MD ACLU Press Release - Wrongful Charges Dropped Against Motorcyclist Prosecuted for Videotaping Encounter with Police

Original MD ACLU Press Release

Graber said he has since sold the motorcycle for $5,000, far less than the $10,500 he says he paid for it a year earlier. He said he still owed several thousand dollars on the bike but took the loss. "I don't want to ever have a motorcycle again," he said.

Carlos Miller posts re Anthony Graber

Dragonators: Biker facing 16 years prison for GoPro video of traffic cops