Saturday, February 12, 2011

Deadbeat judge breaks breaks wife's arm, sued for $1-million


You will only see this uncensored news on the Dragonater blog. Normally only criminal cases qualify for free lawyers, not civil trials without risk of jail. But Judge Swann allegedly jails more divorcees than all other judges in Tennessee combined.



Sent: Sat, 12 Feb 2011

Subject: Fwd: Judge Bill Swann Press Release

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
SCHUCHARDT LAW FIRM

Judge Bill Swann Appoints State-Paid Counsel for Man Earning $73,000 per Year

Knoxville, Tennessee – February 3, 2011 – Knox County Circuit Judge Bill
Swann has entered an order appointing a state-paid lawyer for a man who earns $73,000 per year. The order is unusual because – according to Tennessee law – a lawyer should only be appointed when a person has an income below approximately $23,000 per year.

The ruling occurred in the divorce case of Dendy v. Dendy, Case No. 107628. It
benefits the divorcing husband, James Dendy, who is a geologist with URS Corporation, located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee.

Judge Swann’s decision is especially unusual because the Court also found that
the divorcing wife, Amy Dendy, was not indigent, even though she is currently
unemployed, and has never earned more than $39,000 per year during her working
career.

Amy Dendy is a former Knox County school teacher who was laid off during the
recession. Dendy currently writes an internet blog for mothers.

Dendy’s attorney, Elliott Schuchardt, said that “I am highly surprised by Judge
Swann’s decision. This seems like a waste of state funds, given Mr. Dendy’s relatively large income. My client is currently appealing the ruling.”

See Tenn. Sup. Ct. R. 29 (2010); 45 C.F.R. Pt. 1611, App. A. (providing a benchmark of approximately $22,900 for granting indigency status for a household of three).

Schuchardt indicated that there were other problems with the case. “The parties
have attended over twenty-five hearings in this case, since July 2007. However, Judge Swann still won’t allow my client to even speak to her two young daughters on the telephone.” The Court has twice refused to hold a hearing in connection with this issue.

Amy Dendy will be presenting a motion on February 9, 2011 asking Judge Swann
to recuse himself from the case on the grounds that her former husband, James Dendy, allegedly claimed that his family made campaign contributions to Judge Bill Swann.

For further information, contact:

Elliott J. Schuchardt
Schuchardt Law Firm
336 McCready Way
Sewickley, PA 15143
Phone: (412) 414-5138
E-mail: elliott016[@]gmail.com
www.schuchardtlaw.com

See also:

Note how Metropulse censored this press release - Metropulse is owned, edited and published by the Knoxville News Sentinel, which endorsed Judge Swann in the past election.

Knoxville News Sentinel censored an 8-page political advert by the Dragonater's brother in his campaign for Judge Swann's job - Judge Swann is a convicted deadbeat dad who has been married 4 times, who allegedly broke his wife's arm, so KNS editorial board selected him for endorsement to run divorce court in Knox County.

Judge Bill Swann sued for $1-million libel - It's interesting that Judge Swann's "First Amendment" lawyer, Dick Hollow, was porno king Larry Flint's personal attorney. As Mr. Hollow told The Dragonator, "I wish I'd never taken this case!" Jury trial ASAP.

Press Release and Petition for Contempt: Judge Bill Swann Refused to Pay Child Support, Charged with Civil Contempt of Court - Backup copy

Candidate for governor Leola McConnell missing and feared murdered while investigating Judge Swann's alleged S&M video - "In 1984 I watched George W. Bush enthusiastically and expertly perform a homosexual act on another man, one Victor Ashe," said McConnell. "Ashe is the current U.S. ambassador to Poland; and he too should come out, like former New Jersey Gov. James McGreevy, and admit to being a gay American. Other homo-erotic acts were also performed by then-private citizen George W. Bush. I know this because I performed one of them on him myself."


Owners of Knoxville News Sentinel, Mr Scripps and Mr Howard, support Judge Bill Swann, and are members of Bohemian Grove homosexual nudist compound for snuff kiddie porn.




Is Judge Baumgartner's suspension and pending arrest part of the alleged extortion racket run by Judge Swann?

Judge Baumgartner allowed an innocent Vietnam veteran to be convicted and sent to prison, now that taking video of fully-clothed adults at a public swimming pool at your own apartment is "kiddie porn".

Accused red-light camera sniper Cliff Clark got moved from Baumgartner's court and won dismissal of his case. Baumgartner refused to allow digging up the rotting corpse of Knox district attorney general Ed Dossett, during the murder trial of his alleged black widow (and her unidentified co-conspirators).




TBI said to be looking at whether Judge Richard Baumgartner got pills from felon

18 February 2011

KNOXVILLE, TENN. -- The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation is probing whether Knox County Criminal Court Judge Richard Baumgartner acquired prescription painkillers from a man under his legal thumb, the News Sentinel has learned.

Sources familiar with the probe have confirmed that the TBI is looking at the link between Baumgartner and Christopher Lee Gibson, a 40-year-old probationer in the judge's court. The sources requested anonymity because the investigation is ongoing.

Late last week, Al Schmutzer Jr., a special prosecutor assigned to head up the investigation of Baumgartner, sought and received from Special Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood a probation violation warrant against Gibson that alleged Gibson, a convicted felon, had a handgun in his possession.

The warrant offered no details, and Gibson was allowed to go free on his own recognizance without posting bond.

The News Sentinel has learned that days before Baumgartner abruptly stepped down Jan. 27 from the bench for what he said was an indefinite medical leave, the TBI obtained a photograph of a dark blue Buick with judicial tags parked in Gibson's driveway.

The judge has driven a similar vehicle with judicial tags.

The photograph was taken by Gibson's ex-wife, Darlene Michelle Gibson, Sources say she took the photograph after Christopher Gibson threatened to use the judge's influence against her in a domestic court battle.

The Gibsons divorced in March 2009 but remain legally bound in matters of child support and custody issues, court records show.

It's not clear when the photograph was taken or when she turned the photograph over to attorney Russell Greene.

Greene has, court records show, represented both the Gibsons in the past. Greene served as Darlene Gibson's attorney in 2008 when she was charged with shoplifting from a Sears store in Knoxville. He represented Christopher Gibson in a 2004 case in which Darlene Gibson was one of the victims.

Greene was contacted by the TBI days before Baumgartner took a leave and was asked to turn over the photograph. It's not known how the agency became aware of the photograph or how long the agency has been investigating the judge's alleged illegal procurement of prescription painkillers.

Greene declined comment Thursday and referred questions to his attorney, Gregory P. Isaacs.

Isaacs said Greene consulted his firm after the initial contact from the TBI.

"Initially, Mr. Greene and our firm declined to produce the photograph," Isaacs said.

Greene relented, Isaacs said, only after the TBI obtained a client confidentiality waiver from Darlene Gibson and Isaacs' firm obtained an opinion from the state Board of Professional Responsibility, which polices lawyers, that Greene should turn over the photograph.

"This decision was made after careful and deliberate review of Mr. Greene's ethical and professional duties as an attorney," Isaacs said. "I want to be perfectly clear both Mr. Greene and our law firm have the highest regard for Judge Richard Baumgartner."

Christopher Gibson pleaded guilty in April 2007 at a hearing before Baumgartner. The plea agreement shows he received a four-year probationary term for aggravated assault and reckless endangerment. His probation would have expired this April but for the violation warrant filed by Schmutzer last week.

Neither Schmutzer nor the judge's defense attorney, Donald A. Bosch, would comment on Christopher Gibson's role in the probe.

All phone numbers contained in court files for Christopher Gibson and his ex-wife were disconnected, including the business number for Gibson's drilling company. The News Sentinel did reach the couple's 18-year-old son, who confirmed his father "was the one under investigation" but declined to reveal his father's whereabouts or relay a message to him.

Christopher Gibson has a history of assaults involving gunplay and threats. He has convictions in the early 1990s for aggravated assault and aggravated robbery. In the case that led to his 2007 plea before Baumgartner, Christopher Gibson was accused of forcing Darlene Gibson into his truck. When friends sought to intervene, Christopher Gibson threatened them at gunpoint and opened fire on their car in a parking lot at a busy intersection in North Knoxville. An off-duty Knox County Sheriff's Office deputy, a state probation officer and a Knoxville Police Department officer who were traveling separately all witnessed the gunfire, according to warrants.

The TBI is also investigating the relationship between Baumgartner and Deena Castleman, a former defendant in the drug court he oversaw. Castleman said in an interview earlier this week she and the judge were "close friends" but not sexually involved. She said he offered her help, including recommending her for jobs, but insisted he did so because he was "a great judge and a great man."

She acknowledged she had a cell number for Baumgartner. The TBI has asked drug court Director Ron Hanaver about a cell phone the judge asked that the program provide him.

Castleman is a confessed pill addict who is facing charges including possession of painkillers, DUI, burglary and theft.

Baumgartner, who has been on the bench for 19 years and has presided over some of the county's most high-profile trials, is undergoing treatment for an undisclosed ailment at an undisclosed facility. He continues to draw his $154,320 annual salary.




Judge Baumgartner inquiry targets drug court defendant

She says she is just 'close friends' with judge...

17 February 2011

KNOXVILLE, TENN. -- The Tennessee Bureau of Investigation is probing the relationship between a former Knox County Drug Court defendant and Judge Richard Baumgartner, the News Sentinel has learned.

But the defendant at issue - Deena Castleman - insisted in an interview Wednesday that the judge was nothing more than a benevolent benefactor.

"We did become pretty close friends," Castleman said. "He cared about me - not in a sexual way. I looked up to him as a father figure. I love that man but there ain't no sexual attraction about him."

Baumgartner is on medical leave and under a criminal probe by the TBI for the alleged illegal procurement of prescription pills. Special prosecutor Al Schmutzer Jr. has declined to detail the scope of the investigation.

Contacted on Wednesday, Drug Court Director Ron Hanaver confirmed that the TBI served him with a subpoena signed by Special Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood last week for the release to agents of Castleman's file.

Hanaver had refused an earlier request without a court order because of confidentiality concerns. He also acknowledged that TBI agents quizzed him about Baumgartner's relationship with drug court defendants.

"(The agents asked) if I knew of any complaints or if I heard any complaints from any individuals about Judge Baumgartner" alleging he showed undue favoritism to Castleman or any others, Hanaver said.

Hanaver declined to reveal his answer.

Baumgartner's defense attorney, Donald A. Bosch, said Wednesday night that he did not believe the judge has ever shown "inappropriate favoritism for any participant in his court whether it be drug court" or his regular Criminal Court docket.

Castleman said she was in the drug court program from 2003 to 2008, when she graduated. She said she later "ran into him at the courthouse" and, after discussing her attempt to get a job, he took her to his office and made phone calls to potential employers on her behalf. He also had offered her help with a visitation dispute involving her son and, when she wound up in legal trouble again in 2009, "he told me he would ask one of his friends, (attorney) John Boucher, if he would mind representing me," she said.

Boucher, who since has been appointed to represent Castleman in a slew of charges she has racked up since 2009, was not immediately available for comment.

Castleman also acknowledged that she gave Knox County Sheriff's Office detectives who arrested her for "panhandling" at a Pilot truck stop on Strawberry Plains Pike last May a cell phone number for Baumgartner in hopes of avoiding arrest.

"I was scared," she said. "I was using (drugs). I was high. I said, 'Call Judge B.' "

Hanaver confirmed that Baumgartner came to him "about a year and a half ago" and asked to be supplied by the drug court a cell phone solely for use in the program, which Baumgartner helped found and oversaw.

Hanaver thought it was an odd request since the judge's role in drug court was to meet weekly with drug court defendants to review their progress while Hanaver and his staff actually provided day-to-day case management.

"But when you have a judge ask for something and you have the ability to give it, then you do what the judge asks," he said.

The TBI inquired about the phone when agents interviewed Hanaver. The drug court director said the program itself and its staff of eight are not the subject of any TBI probe. It is continuing to operate in the judge's absence.

Castleman, meanwhile, faces trial on charges including panhandling, possession of prescription painkillers, DUI, breaking into a woman's house and stealing an Xbox game system, and stealing a woman's purse at a Target store. She racked up the charges in four incidents from October 2009 to July 2010.

"Once a revered Knox County Criminal Court judge, Richard Baumgartner on Tuesday shuffled into a federal courtroom in shackles, accused of covering up the drug-trafficking crimes of the mistress he met via a Drug Court program he helped found. Baumgartner, who sent thousands of people to prison in his nearly two-decade-long tenure as judge, was arrested Tuesday as he drove away from his East Knox County farm and hauled into U.S. District Court with shackles on his feet and a chain wrapped around his belly and connected to handcuffs."

-Jamie Satterfield, Knoxville News Sentinel, Former Judge Richard Baumgartner faces 7 federal counts of failing to report felonious activity, May 16, 2012


Friday, February 11, 2011

The Law of Your Case


$30-million per year for jewish Judge Raving Bitch Judy, bumper stickers sold at UT College of Art

THE DRAGONATER WINS IN TRAFFIC COURT AT DEALS GAP, RAISES SPEED LIMIT TO 65 MPH ON THE DRAGON - NOLLE PROSEQUI BY BLOUNT COUNTY ATTORNEY GENERAL. NO TESTIMONY, HEARING NOR TRIAL WHATSOEVER. 60 MPH SPEEDING TICKET DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, COSTS PAID BY THE STATE, IN BLOUNT COUNTY GENERAL SESSIONS COURT WITH JUDGE BREWER. THP TROOPER RANDALL HUCKEBY ADMITTED ON VIDEOTAPE DURING TRAFFIC STOP THAT ALL SPEEDING TICKETS NORTHBOUND ON US129 AT MILE MARKER 0.5 ARE FEDERAL JURISDICTION, NOT STATE JURISDICTION (VIDEO BY THE DRAGONATER). TDOT ADMITTED IN WRITING THAT THE MANDATORY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SURVEY SPEED AUDIT WAS NEVER PERFORMED, IN VIOLATION OF TN CODE, THUS THE POSTED 30 MPH SPEED LIMIT ON THE DRAGON REVERTS TO THE DEFAULT 65 MPH IN TN CODE. THE DRAGONATER ALSO MADE VIDEO OF TROOPER HUCKEBY SPEEDING UP TO 60 MPH ON THE DRAGON IN A 30 MPH ZONE, WITHOUT MANDATORY EMERGENCY LIGHTS NOR SIREN, IN VIOLATION OF TN CODE, AND PERJURY IN HIS PERSONNEL FILE, WHICH SHOWED HIS $100,000+ SALARY. 2007 TDOT SAFETY AUDIT REPORT CONFESSED THAT THP'S JOB IS TO BAN ALL COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES ON THE DRAGON, SO THP TICKETS INCREASED 11,400% IN BLOUNT COUNTY. THP'S STALKER RADAR OPERATOR MANUAL CONFESSED THAT RADAR CANNOT MEASURE THE SPEED OF VEHICLES WITHIN 18 MPH OF ACTUAL SPEED. WATCH THIS SPACE FOR FULL EVIDENCE FILE. UPDATE 7 MARCH 2011

"You can't use the US Constitution in MY courtroom! You might be able to use it over there in federal court, but not here!"
-Judge Wheeler Rosenbalm, Knox County Circuit Court, John Lee vs City of Knoxville


The Dragonater won that 3-year appeal of a $10 parking ticket by using Rule 202 of TN Rules of Evidence, when the city attorney forgot to enter the city ordinance as an exhibit during her case in chief, thus the city ordinance did not exist in THE LAW OF THE CASE. When the city attorney Hillary Browning rested her case in chief, I moved to dismiss for failure to prosecute, citing Rule 202, that the state court cannot take judicial notice of a city ordinance unless it is entered as an exhibit.

Tennessee Rules of Evidence, Rule 202. Judicial notice of law.

(a) Mandatory Judicial Notice of Law. —The court shall take judicial notice of (1) the common law, (2) the constitutions and statutes of the United States and of every state, territory, and other jurisdiction of the United States, (3) all rules adopted by the United States Supreme Court or by the Tennessee Supreme Court, and (4) any rule or regulation of which a statute of the United States or Tennessee mandates judicial notice.

(b) Optional Judicial Notice of Law. —Upon reasonable notice to adverse parties, a party may request that the court take, and the court may take, judicial notice of (1) all other duly adopted federal and state rules of court, (2) all duly published regulations of federal and state agencies and proclamations of the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, (3) all duly enacted ordinances of municipalities or other governmental subdivisions, (4) any matter of law which would fall within the scope of this subsection or subsection (a) of this rule but for the fact that it has been replaced, superseded, or otherwise rendered no longer in force, and (5) treaties, conventions, the laws of foreign countries, international law, and maritime law.


(c) Determination by Court. —All determinations of law made pursuant to this rule shall be made by the court and not by the jury. In making its determination the court is not bound by the rules of evidence except those with respect to privileges.

Advisory Commission Comments. Note that judicial notice of ordinances is discretionary and requires notice to adverse parties.


That KPD parking ticket was for "illegal parking" on my own private property, and was the same parking space where KPD and Sutherland Avenue Wrecker Service previously stole another one of my cars, denied towing my car for 2 months while it was listed as stolen in the NCIC database, then sent me a $700 tow bill. The KPD officer admitted on the KPD Dispatch audiotape that my car was legally parked and refused to tow it, but his supervisor ordered him to tow it anyway, without a parking ticket, so no due process hearing was even allowed in court. I never did get my car back, and the Knox County district attorney refused to prosecute the car thieves.

Had I not cited Rule 202, I would have lost the trial, since the judge didn't care about the facts of the case, only THE LAW of the case. This $10 parking ticket was actually part of 3 multi-million-dollar class action lawsuits filed in 3 courts, for a massive cartheft racket run by KPD. Knox County sheriff Tim Hutchison ran his own cartheft racket with convicted copkiller Roy Lee Clark, towing cars from West Town Mall then chopping them for parts.

Law of the Case

The Law of the case is a legal term of art that is applicable mainly in common law, or Anglo-American, jurisdictions that recognize the related doctrine of stare decisis. The phrase refers to instances where "rulings made by a trial court and not challenged on appeal become the law of the case." [1] "Unless the trial court's rulings were clearly in error or there has been an important change in circumstances, the Court's prior rulings must stand." [2] Usually the situation occurs when either a case is on appeal for the second time--e.g., if the reviewing court remanded the matter back to the trial court and the party appeals again, or the case was appealed to a higher appellate court—for example, from an appellate court to the highest court.

As generally used, the term law of the case designates the principle that if an appellate court has passed on a legal question and remanded the cause to the court below for further proceedings, the legal question thus determined by the appellate court will not be differently determined on a subsequent appeal in the same case where the facts remain the same.[3]

The doctrine provides that an appellate court’s determination on a legal issue is binding on both the trial court on remand and an appellate court on a subsequent appeal given the same case and substantially the same facts.[4]

Law of the case, however, is one of policy only and will be disregarded when compelling circumstances call for a redetermination of the determination of a point of law on prior appeal, and this is particularly true where an intervening or a contemporaneous change in law has occurred by overruling former decisions or the establishment of new precedent by controlling authority.[5]

The law of the case doctrine precludes reconsideration of a previously decided issue unless one of three "exceptional circumstances" exists: (1) when substantially different evidence is raised at a subsequent trial; (2) when a subsequent contrary view of the law is decided by the controlling authority; or (3) when a decision is clearly erroneous and would work a manifest injustice.[6]


"Law of the Case" means that a judge will only consider laws in your traffic ticket case if you list in your pleadings every law that applies in your case. So if you fail to name the US Constitution in your motions and briefs, then you have waived all your constitutional rights, and the US Constitution does not apply to you and your case, even on appeal.

This is equally true of the TN Constitution, TN Code, TN Rules of Procedure, TN Rules of Evidence and caselaw. Use it or lose it!

This is why so many appeals are "unpublished" by the courts in their caselaw, which means those cases cannot be used as precedent in any other court. In other words, unpublished appellate opinions are admittedly based on illegal "law of the case". An example is Onks v City of Cookville, 1993 WL 398472, Tenn.App., 1993, where 2 lawyers were sued for their 200 unpaid parking tickets. The lawyers "lost" in city court, "lost" in circuit court, "lost" in the court of appeals. But when the lawyer called their bluff and filed their appeal with the TN Supreme Court, Cookville dismissed all 200 parking tickets and removed all parking meters, giving everyone free parking. Seems The Powers That Be Fascists didn't want a statewide legal precedent banning all parking meters, which would stop private contractors from raping the taxslaves of the "govt" parking meter fees. The lawyers made an equal protection argument, that since govt employees like judges get free parking at the courthouse, then everyone must get free parking.

Since the TN Supreme Court cannot be making bad caselaw, the Law Of The Case had to go. So City of Cookville had to voluntarily dismiss its case. Why Cookville ripped up 200 parking meters...you'll have to call attorney Jerry Burgess to hear the rest of the story.

Note that nobody ever has to pay parking tickets for that reason, along with the fact they lack personal service of process, as required by Rule 4 of TN Rules of Civil Procedure.

If there were such a thing as an honest judge, he would always rule sua sponte (without motion from a party) that the constitutions apply in every traffic ticket case, and he would dismiss all traffic tickets for violating the constitutional right to travel. Note that 75% of judges in USA are not licensed lawyers, and anyone over the age of 19 can be a judge in city court in TN.

So why don't YOU campaign for a new job as judge in traffic court, and dismiss all traffic tickets sua aponte?






Rules of Court and Law of the Case

by Dr Frederick Graves, attorney at law
Pro Se Law School
Jurisdictionary.com

Whether you're being sued or suing someone else, you must understand these two simple things - or risk losing!

Winning is really very simple!

Every lawsuit turns on these two (2) simple things:

#1 ... the law of the case and

#2 ... the rules of court (evidence and procedure)

That's all there is to this game we call court!

If you've been duped by amateurs into seeing lawsuits in any other way, or if you're so scared and confused it's all a muddy puddle of mind-boggling complications, rejoice!

Winning is EASY once you see this simple truth!

#1 - THE LAW OF THE CASE

The law of the case is usually very simple!

No matter what kind of case yours is, if you'll trust me for just a moment (and check me on this) you'll find that every lawsuit turns on what we lawyers call "the law of the case". Every last one of them. Every single one!

In case you didn't know, I've been an attorney for 25 years. (Please don't hold that against me.) The last 13 years have been dedicated to help people just like you to pierce the mystery my profession has woven to hide the simple truths and tactics I teach in my affordable, official step-by-step course - to reveal the amazing simplicity my profession doesn't want you to know - just what you need to know to win in court ... with or without a lawyer!)

It IS simple ... as many thousands have learned!

For example, every foreclosure case turns (win or lose) on a very few legal principles that control the outcome of foreclosure - the rights of the lender versus the rights of the borrower. We attorneys call these principles "the law of the case" of foreclosure. It doesn't matter how big the bank or lender is. It doesn't matter how little the borrower is. The law of the case is the law of the case PERIOD!

The law of the case controls the outcome for those who know how to use the rules of court (evidence and procedure) to prove what the law requires.

Automobile negligence, contract disputes, malpractice, slander, false imprisonment ... whatever a case is about, you'll find "the law of the case" is simple and usually easy to find. My course even shows you how to find it!

Think about it this way: One need not know all the laws to win a simple contract dispute. The law of the case in a contract dispute is usually no more than a few appellate court opinions and perhaps a statute or two at most. If you find and can cite the official authorities that state the law of the case of contracts, you're halfway home!

The rest of the business of winning is simply using the rules to (1) allege what the law of the case requires, and to (2) prove what you've alleged ... whether you're the plaintiff bringing the case or the defendant trying to get out of the line of fire!

#2 - THE RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE

Now let's assume you've found the law of the case that fits the facts of your lawsuit - plaintiff or defendant. You have the official citations and made copies of those so the judge doesn't have to look them up. You've printed out the citations that command a victory for you IF you allege and prove what the law of the case requires.

This is where the rules of evidence and procedure come into play ... and these are incredibly easy to learn!

Let's say a plaintiff is coming after you to foreclose on your home. The first thing you do is find the law of the case that will control the outcome in your state. You now know what must be alleged by the plaintiff and proven by the plaintiff in order for the plaintiff to win. You also now know what you must allege in affirmative defenses and what you need to do with discovery and motions to prove the plaintiff cannot meet the burden of the law.

This stuff really is easy once you see the parts and how they all fit together!

You have tremendous power on your side ... once you know how the game is played to win!

In the 13 years since we started Jurisdictionary I've found the most debilitating factor that infects good people with hopelessness is fear that derives solely from lack of knowlege how the game of litigation is played to win! Not knowing creates fear. Knowledge displaces fear with the confidence you need to overcome your opponent!

Take any apparently complicated thing apart to examine its component parts and you can quickly see how they all fit together. When you first begin, it seems impossible.

But!

If someone shows you how each separate part works with each of the other parts, even the most complicated things are suddenly easy-to-understand. The mystery my profession has woven disappears!

#1 - All lawsuits turn on the law of the case.

#2 - All lawsuits are won (or lost) by clever (or clumsy) use of the rules of court to prove the law and facts.

That's all there is to lawsuits - every one of them!

Every one of you has great legal power!

Sadly, many good people never discover the power that is theirs ... so people who know how to use the rules of court and the law of the case take advantage of them!

Jurisdictionary wants to turn the tables on crooked lawyers and biased judges and protect the "little guys and gals" that are being taken advantage of simply because no one has ever come out with a course like this. No one has ever cared enough to tell you the truth. No one has ever made it this easy-to-understand!

It is easy-to-understand how to win in court once you see things the way I teach them!

Once you find the law of the case (usually no more than two or three statutes and a half-dozen controlling case opinions from appellate courts) you know what must be alleged in the pleadings and what must be proved using discovery and motions and memoranda!

1. The law of the case tells what must be alleged and proved, i.e., the law and the controlling facts.

2. The rules of court tell us how to allege and prove the law and the controlling facts.

There's nothing more to it than that.

THIS IS HOW WINNERS WIN ... HONEST!

Lawyers may drag out a case (so they can make more money billing for their time), and many insist on going to trial (which costs even more money).

But, if you hold the winning cards (i.e., if the law of the case and the facts favor your cause) you can win before trial!

Click this link to watch a FREE VIDEO.

How your Blount County tax money is disappearing

To My Fellow Citizens

For the last several months, Citizens for Better Government has been preparing an analysis of where Blount County spends your taxpayer money, compared to the three other Tennessee counties closest to us in population.

Citizens for Blount County's Future has invited us to make this presentation, titled:

How your Blount County tax money is disappearing - Why a 20% tax increase is NOT needed

at their open meeting, Tuesday, Feb. 15, at 6:30pm, at the Blount County Library. This is the same presentation made to a "standing room only" crowd at the recent Tea Party meeting.

Please come, to see why the County MUST cut the budget and avoid any tax increase.

Jim Folts [Blount County Commissioner]
Citizens for Better Government
www.blounttn.net

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Report suspicious activity to Homeland Security



Citizen makes phone call to Department of Homeland Security but nobody answers, then calls the Dallas FBI office and gets an outsourced call center that barely speaks English..



Walmart Shoppers: Homeland Security Wants You to Rat

If you've ridden the subway in New York City any time in the past few years, you've probably seen the signs: "If You See Something, Say Something."

In Washington, D.C., Metro riders are treated to a recording of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano urging them to report suspicious sights to the proper authorities.



Now, Wal-Mart shoppers across the country will see Napolitano's Orwellian message in a video as they stand in the checkout line.

Why Walmart?

"We are expanding 'See Something, Say Something' in a number of venues," Napolitano tells NPR's Audie Cornish. "It's Wal-Mart, it's Mall of America, it's different sports and sporting arenas, it's transit systems. It's a catchy phrase, but it reminds people that our security is a shared responsibility."

The "See Something, Say Something" campaign has had some major successes— most notably earlier this year when a street vendor reported smoke coming out of an SUV parked in New York's Times Square, resulting in the arrest and conviction of Pakistani immigrant Faisal Shahzad. But The New York Times reports the program has resulted in relatively few terror-related arrests.

Creepy?

Homeland security expert Frank Cilluffo says that may be because the message is coming from Washington rather than local officials who are more trusted in their communities.

"I think having Secretary Napolitano on screens throughout the country provides a bit of a creepy feeling," he says. "That shouldn't be from Washington."



Cilluffo also questions the simplicity of "See Something, Say Something."

"I think the message is long on nouns, short on verbs. I think we need some specificity," he says. "Ultimately, what are people looking for, what sort of suspicious activity, what actions should they take, and who do they specifically turn to?"

More To Do

Cilluffo says Homeland Security officials should be constantly re-evaluating and changing their policies as they discover what works and what doesn't.

"Homeland security is not an end state, it's a journey," he says. "We've made some significant strides, but I think we still have more to do."












Lesbian Secretary Napolitano Announces Expansion of "If You See Something, Say Something" Campaign to Walmart Stores Across the Nation

Release Date: December 6, 2010
For Immediate Release
Ministry of Truth
Contact: 202-282-8010

Washington, D.C. - Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano today announced the expansion of the Department's national "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign to hundreds of Walmart stores across the country - launching a new partnership between DHS and Walmart to help the American public play an active role in ensuring the safety and security of our nation.

"Homeland security starts with hometown security, and each of us plays a critical role in keeping our country and communities safe," said Secretary Napolitano. "I applaud Walmart for joining the ‘If You See Something, Say Something' campaign. This partnership will help millions of shoppers across the nation identify and report indicators of terrorism, crime and other threats to law enforcement authorities."

The "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign—originally implemented by New York City's Metropolitan Transportation Authority and funded, in part, by $13 million from DHS' Transit Security Grant Program—is a simple and effective program to engage the public and key frontline employees to identify and report indicators of terrorism, crime and other threats to the proper transportation and law enforcement authorities.

More than 230 Walmart stores nationwide launched the "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign today, with a total of 588 Walmart stores in 27 states joining in the coming weeks. A short video message will play at select checkout locations to remind shoppers to contact local law enforcement to report suspicious activity.

Over the past five months, DHS has worked with its federal, state, local and private sector partners, as well as the Department of Justice, to expand the "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign and Nationwide SAR Initiative to communities throughout the country—including the recent state-wide expansions of the "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign across Minnesota and New Jersey. Partners include the Mall of America, the American Hotel & Lodging Association, Amtrak, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, sports and general aviation industries, and state and local fusion centers across the country.

In the coming months, the Department will continue to expand the "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign nationally with public education materials and outreach tools designed to help America's businesses, communities and citizens remain vigilant and play an active role in keeping the country safe.



OPERATION NORTHWOODS> - The ABC News report on the signed confession by US Govt for perping terrorist attacks, sniper attacks, airline hijackings and bombings in USA then blame patsies. Call 202-282-8010 and report suspicious activity today!



Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Hackers fuck with redlight scameras



Tinfoil Hat Time Anyone?

National Motorists Association
Newsletter 109

There aren't many places we go in public nowadays that are "off the grid." Cameras track our movements through a myriad of applications --- store security (inside and out), ATM transactions, traffic cams, you name it.

Who hasn't seen crime procedurals on television where a suspect's movements are tracked across town from one camera feed to the next. If it is on TV it must be true, right?

Until recent times, such camera systems were hardwired to some sort of analog monitoring system. These systems were mostly self-contained and reasonably secure.

More prevalent today are wireless setups, where each camera has its own IP (Internet Protocol) address and can stream video directly to a remote network device that manages the camera and its recording schedule.

Just as hackers can wreak havoc by finding and tapping into unsecured computers through IP addresses, the same can be done with cameras that don't have the proper security protocols in place.

According to Tom Connor of Ars Technica, IP cameras can be located quite readily by anyone who has basic computer skills and knows what to search for online. Says Connor, ". . . users need only load a simple browser-based applet (typically Flash, Java, or ActiveX) to view live or recorded video, control cameras, or check their settings."

He also noted that IP devices come with easy-to-follow instructions to set onboard security that, when done properly, will lock out uninvited intruders. Unfortunately, many camera owners never bother to take the few minutes necessary to do so.

Connor followed up by searching for and tapping into unsecured cameras worldwide, from small villages in far-away places to doctors' offices to aquarium tanks.

Among the cameras he accessed were three red-light cameras in an unnamed Texas town. The lack of IP security enabled Connor to change the camera settings which, thankfully, he didn't follow through with.

As if we didn't need another reason to oppose red-light and speed cameras.

Sunday, February 6, 2011

Speeding cop KIA



The cop wasn't killed by speeding, he was killed by the sudden stop without a seatbelt.

Report: Officer Killed In Crash Was Speeding

BALTIMORE (AP) — An investigative report concludes that a Baltimore police officer who died when his cruiser crashed into the back of a fire truck was speeding.
The report also say Officer Thomas Portz Jr., 32, was probably distracted by a film crew on the opposite side of a highway when he crashed in October.

The report was obtained by The Baltimore Sun under the Public Information Act. It also says Portz was not wearing his seat belt.

According to the report, Portz had been speeding at 71 mph. The speed limit is 50 mph on that portion U.S. 40. Portz was not responding to an emergency call.



Comments

I feel bad for his family but when does a cop not speed?

Agree completely, the police fly up and down the street in front of my house (30mph or more above limit) and when I call to “complain” and ask that they be careful. The police post a car out front for a few days ticketing civilians for doing 10 mph over.

I say “good”, one less distracted driver and speeder off the road. Lucikily he didn’t take others with him, as is so often the case.

I AGREE!!!! The Police Speed alll the time just because they can!! They text and talk on their cell phens while driving !! Better him than my child !!!!

Sorry the young man lost his life, but these young men and women are given far more credit than they deserve, and authority than they can handle, they truly need more seasoned supervision from older staff. Life is not what you see on TV, stop trying to be TV cops. Just do your job.

When was the last time an officer was written up for driving without a seatbelt, talking on a cell phone, or speeding. Yes they do it and sometimes they need to speed to respond to a true emergency. But sometimes they just do it because they can get away with it. It is terrible that the man died. If he would have been wearing his seatbelt he would probably still be alive, even though he was speeding. If he was not speeding but not wearing his seatbelt he probably would have been alive.

Why did WJZ have to file a Freedom of Information Act request to get information on an accident? Portz was not responding to a call as has been written here. Unfortunately, the police cover-up anything involving one of their own. It is unfortunate that this officer was killed, but I’ll bet there were many others killed on the day this officer was killed. There is an industry that has built up on the police cult and they have a vested interested in keeping the this myth of hero. I have a great deal of sympathy to his family and friends, but it doesn’t justify creating a myth around his death. It does no one any good. Does anyone know the name of the sedan driver killed the same day that Chesley was killed in the same type of robbery? Why was the off-duty Chesley a hero and not the sedan driver?

First and foremost, I support the police department. However, when I used to live in Essex, police would fly up and down the backroads of the townhomes there. One evening my neighbors son was almost struck by one of their cars as he went to retrieve a ball for a younger child that had made its way into the road. After seeing this, I asked the cop if he would slow down on the roads. His response, demanding to see my liscence and then hastling me for 10 minutes or so until he gave me my identification back. Ridiculous. I understand there need for speeding when in imminent situations, but it’s the norm with Police Officers. Oh and my father is a retired officer, he would speed each and every time we were in a car. On the occasion he was pulled over, he’d flash his old badge, wink and nod, and the cop would let him go. That is until on one occasion we were in VA and he tried to do the same thing there, the cop there laughed at him and said, speeding is speeding regardless of your badge or title and then handed my father a ticket. Sweet justice, wish there were more Officers like that VA trooper.

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Deputy DoNutt crashes into house...GO VOLS!



"Toby Champion: Offensive lineman living in Knoxville and working as a deputy sheriff with the Knox County sheriff's department."
-Where are they now? The 1998 Tennessee national championship team


Deputy crashes into North Knox house

KNOXVILLE, TENN. — A North Knox County family's quiet Sunday evening at home was disrupted when a sheriff’s deputy slammed his cruiser into their garage.

The impact shoved a truck parked in the garage at 2117 Cunningham Road into the home’s den, but no one was injured, according to Knox County Sheriff’s Office spokeswoman Martha Dooley.

The crash occurred about 9:24 p.m., Dooley said, when Officer Toby Champion was en route to a domestic call involving a weapon.

Dooley said Champion apparently failed to negotiate a curve and struck the home.

Champion is a former University of Tennessee football player. He played from 1998-2000.

The crash is under investigation by the Sheriff’s Office.

Comments

" apparently " ???? These supermen need driving lessons ! HAve you noticed how many law enforcement vechicles have been totaled lately , and guess who's paying for them , not the officers. They only get paid days off to recoup. Check into it KNS.

"Sir, you can't come in here without a warrant!"

I wonder if this is the same Toby Champion that played football at UT.

What does the fact he played UT football have to do with anything relating to this story?!

Well zipperhead, I asked a simple question because I remember a Toby Champion playing for UT. This could be the first time a UT football player has been on the right side of the law!

(This comment was removed by the site staff.)

But, he didn't get there because he was driving over his head and crashed his car. You can't help if you don't get there. And yes, I do know what I'm talking about.

Actually this home has been hit by a vehicle 4 times in the past like 6 years. Its unfortunate for the homeowners, but the other 3 times it was hit it was not determined that the drivers were being erratic, just an accident.

Home invasion cop-style. So what happened with the "domestic call"?

Well the 24 hour arrest record had several assaults... and prostitution haha

Anyone considered that the family could have been frying doughnuts and the officer tried to make it a drive through, might not be his fault.

:)It might of been a sugar drop from the lack of dounuts.(:

Another case of a civilians getting in the way of law enforcement.
Great Job!

"The crash is under investigation by the Sheriff’s Office."

Really. I'll betcha that they will find the officer was not at fault and try to find some way to blame the homeowner for maybe like building a house on a curve or crash zone or something like that. THP should be investigating this instead of letting the agency that's directly involved handle it internally. That's how curroption starts.

Maybe not blame them directly but they are probably investigating it to report it as a no-fault accident meaning the homeowners would have to pay for the damage...

I have noticed anymore whenever you pass a police car there either on there cel phones or busy looking at there laptops. And there usually all over the road i see it all the time. Lets remember folks its not a coffee shop or a phone booth so lets pay attention to the road .

How about they obey the same laws they want us to. If it is too dangerous to text while driving I am pretty sure it would be too dangerous to use a lap top while driving. They have radios in their cars and dispatchers to tell them where to go and give them the info they need.

Like somebody else said, what if a person had been standing in the driveway or in front of the car he hit? OR what if somebody had been inside the house where he hit it? Somebody coud have died for pure stupidity. He needs to slow down.
Get there when you do. If the domestic squabble ends in one killing the other then oh well. They won't have to deal with them any longer. Those calls are usually the same people over and over. After the first time they should tell them they aren't coming back. Either get away from each other or learn to get along. We aren't playing referee and didn't take you to raise. Grow up and be adults!

If it is a red call (where you use your sirens) the dispatcher gives you the signal, the address and any pertinent info. Depending on the circumstances and if the dispatcher deems necessary, a domestic involving a weapon should be a red call. If the call is a normal call (say a dispute, wreck or fight where immediate danger is not happening right NOW) then the dispatcher only gives you the signal and your call sign. You would have to look at your laptop for the address and the info involving the call...

if you are going to start pointing fingers and grandstanding then you really should be somewhat knowledgeable on the subject yourself. obviously you dont even know the law you are accusing officers of violating. if u are refering to the states anti-texting law (tca 55-8-199)then you need to read this section

TN Code 55-8-199

(e) This section shall not apply to the following persons:

(1) Officers of the state or of any county, city or town charged with the enforcement of the laws of the state, when in the actual discharge of their official duties;

Dragonater Note: Constitutional Equal Protection requires all laws to apply equally to all citizens, or they are VOID.


thus exempting officers from using their cell phones and/or laptops. i dont understand why everyone is so quick to bash the officers who protect us. hopefully your public display of ignorance of the law will serve as an example to others so quick to cry foul on officers. now having said all that, i hate to admit that i do STRONGLY AGREE with your last paragraph

:) A dounut rolled under his feet and couldn`t get the car to slow down (:



Knox County deputy crashes cruiser into home

KNOXVILLE, TENN. - A Knox County sheriff's deputy crashed his cruiser into a house in the 2100 block of Cunningham Road in North Knoxville around 9:00 p.m. Sunday.

Witnesses say the officer went down an embankment, knocking out part of a fence. He then came close to hitting a tree before spinning around backwards and crashing into the family's garage.

The impact of the crash caused the family's vehicle to go through a wall.

"I was downstairs watching TV in the basement, in our basement den," said Les Pierce, the owner of the home. "All of a sudden I heard a big crash and my pick-up came through the wall, lots of smoke and dust."

Pierce said the deputy seemed like he was in shock and was trying to find his cell phone to call for assistance.

He says the officer did not appear to be injured. No one inside was hurt.

The cause of the crash is still under investigation.

Comments

I truly feel for this family. One minute their life is normal and the next everything is turned upside down. If you have ever delt with the county you can get pretty screwed. Notice the officer was never mentioned nor what actually happend.
Knox County needs to check out their officers plus cell phones, computers and Krispy kreme.

To the family save every receipt and I feel for you.
They will use you everyway porrible.
Call Don Dare and tell him.

The deputy was probably speeding, punching on the ole computer and on the cell phone... all at the same time. It would have been helpful for more info. If this had been a taxpaying citizen, it would be certain that his/her name would have been released. Did the deputy have to submit a blood sample?

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Dragonater puts Maryville Daily News out of business

Maryville Daily Times Blog goes out of print business

by Former Staff
31 Jan 2011

MARYVILLW, TENN. -- Blount County Publishers Clearinghouse Ltd has reached an agreement to outsource the printing and packaging of The Daily Times Blog to The NOxVile News Sentinel's German printing press. The newspaper's new name will be The NOxVile News Sentinel Of Blount County.

“This decision was made after considering several options,” said Karl Estrada, publisher of The Daily Times Blog. “To achieve the level of quality and efficiency we need to compete against media corporations receiving billions in Banker Bailouts, we determined it would be more cost-effective to fire 30 employees. Time spent signing those paychecks can be better spent on spending executive bonues.”

Grogg Joneston, president of Blount County Publishers Clearinghouse, the owner of The Daily Times Blog, said, “We love placing propaganda for Blount County Mafia Thugs, I mean to say politicians, and are here for the long run. Outsourcing the printing and packaging of The Daily Times Blog newspaper is a decision we jumped at once we saw how my executive pay raise was on the line. Not having to invest in employees will intensify the World Bank's plan to offshore all of America: delivering content that is relevant and wanted by our corporate and government polluters.

“Blount County is a marvelous community, unless you ride a motorcycle, ha ha ha. It has no right to a newspaper that is responsive to its readers and local advertisers and must reflect the Police State that enslaves it well. Outsourcing our printing and packaging will greatly strengthen the monopoly Leviathon that is the Scripps Howard Empire, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bohemian Grove homosexual nudist colony for snuff kiddie porn.”

The decision will affect a number of employees when it begins in mid-March, with suicide counseling available to affected workers, unless they have Tenncare.

The Banner, a new newspeper in Blount County, will now be the only newspaper in Blount County. It is published by Harry Grothjahn, general manager of WBCR 1470 AM and co-host of the Dragonater Radio Show.