Every vehicle tracked and traced in Brit town

Bend over for British Big Brother Bully Bot

Big Brother is watching you: The town where EVERY car is tracked by police cameras

By Anna Edwards
30th July 2011

ENGLAND -- A sleepy Home Counties market town has become the first in Britain to have every car passing through it tracked by police cameras.

Royston, in Hertfordshire, has had a set of police cameras installed on every road leading in and out of it, recording the numberplate of every vehicle that passes them.


Every resident and visitor in Royston is treated as a convicted criminal on parole

The automatic number-plate recognition system will check the plates against a variety of databases, studying them for links to crimes, and insurance and tax records, and alerting police accordingly.

There were just seven incidents of vehicle crime in the town last month, and residents believe the unmarked cameras are an invasion of their privacy.


Hollywood selling you #5 in Short Circuit

The system, due to be switched on in the next few days, also allows police to compile 'hotlists' of vehicles that they are interested in and which will be flagged up when the ANPR system

Details of the cars movements will stay on police records for two years, or five if the car is connected to a crime, the Guardian reported.

The system, which is operated regionally, has sparked fears that the data could be abused and has led to claims that it is a big brother network that the public are completely oblivious of.

Guy Herbert, general secretary from NO2ID, which campaigns against databases storing the public's details, said: 'It's very sinister and quite creepy.


Hollywood says robots that spy on you are cute in Pixar

'They can approach anyone they like, but there's no legal basis for them doing so.
'There's no way to regulate how they use ANPR, they are the authority on it and they have their own rules.

'So there's no way to protect people's privacy.'

Mr Herbert also takes issue with the fact that the cameras are not advertised to the motorist, so many are unaware they have even been caught on the camera.

But Inspector Andy Piper, the ANPR manager for Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire, and a Royston resident himself, insists that the system will not be abused.

He told the Guardian: 'We only deal with people we're interested in stopping - that's the criminal element that comes into our county intent on committing crime, and unsafe drivers, disqualified drivers, or people driving uninsured vehicles, who we want to take off the road.'


Robot Taser cannon loves you

The ANPR cameras, which are not usually advertised to the public, seem bizarre given Royston's low level of crime. The town has a population of 15,000.

Following the most recent meeting of the Royston Neighbourhood Panel, it was decided that the local top priority of speeding should be replaced by shoplifting.

So some have questioned why Hertfordshire Police have taken such measures to track all of cars coming in and out of the town, which borders the Cambridgeshire and Essex counties.

Former Royston mayor Rod Kennedy believes the system is targeting the wrong area and details of vehicles should be deleted, unless they have committed a crime or are not registered.

'I just feel that we are on this slippery slope where everything we do will be monitored. I don't see why the honest citizen in a rural area such as this should have their movements tracked.'

Peaceful: Royston May Fayre, Priory Memorial Gardens, Royston, is a quiet town
But Inspector Piper told the Mail that many businesses were in favour of the system.

'On first sight, the ANPR coverage of such a low crime town as Royston may seem an unusual choice, but ANPR works both as a deterrent and a detection tool.

'The local district council and local business group funded the cameras to help protect their businesses and local residents from crime.

'And when we look at the bigger picture in terms of Hertfordshire, as well as nationally, the position of the cameras makes a lot of sense strategically to target those criminals travelling into the county on the main roads in that area.'

The ANPR system uses a mixture of mobile cameras inside police cars and fixed installations in some locations.

Police argue it helps trace missing people and identify witnesses to help with crimes but James Welch, Legal Director for Liberty, a human rights campaigning group said there needs to be tougher rules to stop it from being vulnerable to misuse.

'ANPR technology captures an identifying marker – a car’s number plate – so has the capability to track and record an individual’s movements far more intrusively than CCTV,' he said.

'While there may be crime detection gains the potential for abuse is great.

'We need an informed debate about the extent and potential of this technology and proper statutory regulation is already long overdue.'


Terminator robot loves you

Cops win million$ suing cops for illegal ticket quotas

"Cops have a[n illegal] quota system."
-Sgt. James Eagan, New York State Police (Retired), from his book, A Speeder's Guide to Avoiding Tickets

"It is illegal for law enforcement agencies to issue quotas for citations or arrests of individuals. The Fraternal Order of Police strongly disagrees with this illegal action and respectfully requests you rescind this action of supervisors at the Knoxville Police Department. If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's still a duck. It's a quota."
-Edward Daniel, attorney at law

"I was put under pressure. It was like a race. How many more people can we get today?"
-KPD police officer under arrest for obstruction of justice and perjury, describing the government's illegal quota in Knoxville, Tennessee

"I think the law enforcement community would agree with me that they would rather be out busting criminals than getting some grandmother who is running late to church doing 56 mph in a 55," TN State Rep Burchett (now mayor of Knox County), author of TN Code banning illegal ticket quotas

LAPD officers allege ticket quotas

By C.J. Lin, Staff Writer
08/04/2011

Ten more LAPD motor officers have sued the city, claiming harassment and retaliation after they complained they were forced to meet illegal traffic-ticket quotas.

The officers, all assigned to the Los Angeles Police Department's West Traffic Division, say they were reprimanded, denied overtime and promotions, or deprived of vacations after they objected to the quotas, according to the lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles Superior Court.

"The officers were directed to meet specific ticket numbers by days, weeks and months," said Matthew McNicholas, one of three attorneys representing the group.

LAPD officials declined to comment on the lawsuit, but denied the department has a policy or practice of requiring officers to write a minimum number of tickets.

"We don't have traffic ticket quotas," said Lt. Andrew Neiman, an LAPD spokesman.

The suit alleges the department tracked the number of tickets they wrote and illegally compared them to the records of other officers.

The plaintiffs filing the suit are Officers Philip Carr, Kevin Cotter, Timothy Dacus, Peter Landelius, Kevin Ree, Kevin Riley, Josh Sewell, Vincent Stroway, James Wallace and Jason Zapatka.

The lawsuit is similar to one filed by two other West Traffic Division officers, who won a $2 million judgment in April. They claimed they were harassed and given poor performance reviews after complaining about ticket quotas.

The newest suit signals poor supervision within the division, said City Councilman Dennis Zine.

"This is not only embarrassing, but it shows that there is a lack of management, and it's a sad commentary on the leadership of that division," said Zine, who was a motor cop and supervisor during his 33-year career with the LAPD.

The lawsuit does not state when the alleged retaliations took place nor does it specify who was in charge at the time.

Under state law, the quotas are illegal because they may force officers to issue improper tickets to meet goals.

"You can't say, `I want you to go out and write 50 tickets a day,' but you can say, `I want you to go out and do 10 hours of work,"' Zine said.

See also:

Tennessee Highway Patrol Ticket Quota Uncovered

THP Memo requiring illegal ticket quota

THP quota increases biker tickets 11,400% at Deals Gap

KPD Memo requiring illegal ticket quota in Knoxville Tennessee

Tennessee State Sen. Tim Burchett pushes ban on traffic ticket quotas

---

Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-402. Official misconduct.

(a) A public servant commits an offense who, with intent to obtain a benefit or to harm another, intentionally or knowingly:

(1) Commits an act relating to the servant's office or employment that constitutes an unauthorized exercise of official power;

(2) Commits an act under color of office or employment that exceeds the servant's official power;

(3) Refrains from performing a duty that is imposed by law or that is clearly inherent in the nature of the public servant's office or employment;

(4) Violates a law relating to the public servant's office or employment; or

(5) Receives any benefit not otherwise authorized by law.

(b) For purposes of subdivision (a)(2), a public servant commits an act under color of office or employment who acts or purports to act in an official capacity or takes advantage of the actual or purported capacity.

(c) It is a defense to prosecution for this offense that the benefit involved was a trivial benefit incidental to personal, professional or business contact, and involved no substantial risk of undermining official impartiality.

(d) An offense under this section is a Class E felony.

(e) Charges for official misconduct may be brought only by indictment, presentment or criminal information; provided, that nothing in this section shall deny a person from pursuing other criminal charges by affidavit of complaint.

HISTORY: Acts 1989, ch. 591, § 1; 1990, ch. 980, § 10.

---

Tennessee Highway Patrol Ticket Quota Uncovered

Tennessee Highway Patrol (THP) troopers are punished for failing to issue a specific number of speeding tickets in at least one part of the state. Attorney Fletcher Long provided WTVF-TV with a copy of a memo THP Sergeant Clifford M. Babits posted on the wall of the Troop C station in Robertson County. ”I can no longer justify fives on evaluations for troopers not producing activity,” Babits wrote. “I require three things. 1. Answer the radio, 2. Work your crashes, and 3. WRITE TICKETS. I take some of the blame for not properly motivating ya’ll in the area of activity. Overall activity last year (2008) was well below the district average… Because activity plays such a high part of an everyday road trooper’s requirement, it is going to weigh heavy on yearly evaluation scores.”


These scores, with ‘five’ being the highest rating, are key to winning promotions, extra pay and the most desirable types of assignments. According to the memo, scoring is based solely on the number of tickets issued, although other factors such as routinely failing to follow orders can result in a lowered score. Babits set six hundred tickets a year, or three tickets per day, as the bare minimum.

“Let me stress I am not putting a quota on anyone,” Babits wrote. “I don’t care if a trooper writes below the 600 mark, it is his or her evaluation score, not mine. If a trooper turns in 600 citations per year, his or her overall evaluation will not be above the average score of three… I must be able to justify giving a trooper a five. Low activity is a killer.”

It takes 800 citations per year, or four tickets per day, to earn the top score. A rating of four is earned by writing 700 tickets per year or 3.5 per day. Those who fail toexceed the average score of three are punished by not being allowed to earn time-and-a-half pay on overtime assignments.

“Effective immediately, a trooper that does not produce above average activity (17.5 tickets per week) will not be able to work grant overtime in my county,” Babits wrote.

Tennessee Highway Patrol officials deny any quota exists. Many state police forces use the average number of tickets written by troops or stations to encourage a steady year-on-year increase in the number of speeding tickets issued.

43 Comments:

In other news, the Pope is Catholic, and bears crap in the woods.

"To tax and collect."

---

TEXAS TRANSPORTATION CODE

TITLE 7. VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC

SUBTITLE I. ENFORCEMENT OF TRAFFIC LAWS

CHAPTER 720. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 720.001. BADGE OF SHERIFF, CONSTABLE, OR DEPUTY.

(a) A sheriff, constable, or deputy sheriff or deputy constable may not arrest or accost a person for driving a motor vehicle on a highway in violation of a law relating to motor vehicles unless the sheriff, constable, or deputy displays a badge showing the sheriff's, constable's, or deputy's title.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person violates this section. An offense under this section is a misdemeanor punishable in the same manner as an offense under Section 86.011, Local Government Code.(c) An officer charged by law to take or prosecute a complaint under this section shall be removed from office if the officer refuses to do so.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.

Sec. 720.002. PROHIBITION ON TRAFFIC-OFFENSE QUOTAS.

(a) A political subdivision or an agency of this state may not establish or maintain, formally or informally, a plan to evaluate, promote, compensate, or discipline:(1) a peace officer according to the officer's issuance of a predetermined or specified number of any type or combination of types of traffic citations; or(2) a justice of the peace or a judge of a county court, statutory county court, municipal court, or municipal court of record according to the amount of money the justice or judge collects from persons convicted of a traffic offense.

(b) A political subdivision or an agency of this state may not require or suggest to a peace officer, a justice of the peace, or a judge of a county court, statutory county court, municipal court, or municipal court of record:(1) that the peace officer is required or expected to issue a predetermined or specified number of any type or combination of types of traffic citations within a specified period; or(2) that the justice or judge is required or expected to collect a predetermined amount of money from persons convicted of a traffic offense within a specified period.

(c) Repealed by Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 737, Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2009.

(d) This section does not prohibit a municipality from obtaining budgetary information from a municipal court or a municipal court of record, including an estimate of the amount of money the court anticipates will be collected in a budget year.

(e) A violation of this section by an elected official is misconduct and a ground for removal from office. A violation of this section by a person who is not an elected official is a ground for removal from the person's position.

(f) In this section:(1) "Conviction" means the rendition of an order by a court imposing a punishment of incarceration or a fine.(2) "Traffic offense" means an offense under:(A) Chapter 521; or(B) Subtitle C.

Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.Amended by: Acts 2009, 81st Leg., R.S., Ch. 737, Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2009.

---

MINNISOTA STATE LAW

169.985 TRAFFIC CITATION QUOTA PROHIBITED.

A law enforcement agency may not order, mandate, require, or suggest to a peace officer a quota for the issuance of traffic citations, including administrative citations authorized under section 169.999, on a daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, or yearly basis.

299D.08 TRAFFIC CITATION QUOTA PROHIBITED.

The State Patrol or a law enforcement agency shall not order, mandate, require, or suggest to a patrol trooper, commercial vehicle inspector, or law compliance representative that the patrol trooper, inspector, or representative issue a certain number of traffic citations on a daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, or yearly quota basis.

84.0285 GAME AND FISH CITATION QUOTAS PROHIBITED.

The commissioner of natural resources, or the director of the Division of Enforcement and Field Service, may not order, mandate, require, or in any manner suggest, directly or indirectly, to a conservation officer that the conservation officer issue a certain number of game and fish law violations on a daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, or yearly quota basis.

---

California Code

Arrest Quota Defined

41600. For purposes of this chapter, "arrest quota" means any requirement regarding the number of arrests made, or the number of citations issued, by a peace officer, or parking enforcement employee, or the proportion of those arrests made and citations issued by a peace officer or parking enforcement employee, relative to the arrests made and citations issued by another peace officer or parking enforcement employee, or group of officers or employees.

Added Ch. 1111, Stats. 1976. Effective January 1, 1977.
Amended Sec. 1, Ch. 105, Stats. 2002. Effective January 1, 2003.

Citation Defined

41601. For purposes of this chapter, "citation" means a notice to appear, notice of violation, or notice of parking violation.

Added Ch. 1111, Stats. 1976. Effective January 1, 1977

Arrest Quota Prohibited

41602. No state or local agency employing peace officers or parking enforcement employees engaged in the enforcement of this code or any local ordinance adopted pursuant to this code, may establish any policy requiring any peace officer or parking enforcement employees to meet an arrest quota.

Amended Sec. 3, Ch. 105, Stats. 2002. Effective January 1, 2003.

Evaluation of Peace Officers Performance

41603. No state or local agency employing peace officers or parking enforcement employees engaged in the enforcement of this code shall use the number of arrests or citations issued by a peace officer or parking enforcement employees as the sole criterion for promotion, demotion, dismissal, or the earning of any benefit provided by the agency. Those arrests or citations, and their ultimate dispositions, may only be considered in evaluating the overall performance of a peace officer or parking enforcement employees. An evaluation may include, but shall not be limited to, criteria such as attendance, punctuality, work safety, complaints by citizens, commendations, demeanor, formal training, and professional judgment.

Amended Sec. 4, Ch. 105, Stats. 2002. Effective January 1, 2003.

---

Ex-officers seek to stop traffic grants

By Daniel Borunda
EL PASO TIMES
11/01/2011

Five former El Paso police officers have filed a request for an injunction against city officials, alleging police have an illegal quota system for traffic tickets.

The ex-officers claim they were forced to resign, but City Manager Joyce Wilson said the officers resigned when faced with termination linked to allegations of falsified time sheets.

The resignations come after an investigation began in late summer regarding the misappropriation of overtime linked to the Selective Traffic Enforcement Program, or STEP, grant. The investigation has since expanded beyond traffic grants.

A week ago, Lt. Alfred Lowe, head of the Crimes Against Persons Unit, was placed on administrative leave pending an investigation into overtime regarding a state grant paying for anti-gang operations.

The petition for an injunction was filed last week in the 34th District Court and seeks to stop the El Paso Police Department from using state traffic enforcement grants and alleges that a quota system is being used.

A hearing date is pending on the petition filed by ex-officers Luis Acosta, Ana Reza, Jorge Arellano, Michael Arzaga and Luis Alonzo Ortiz against Police Chief Greg Allen, Wilson and Mayor John Cook.

Each officer was with the department for more than 10 years until their resignations in late August and September. They are represented by lawyers Stuart Leeds and Theresa Caballero.

Leeds and Caballero provided the El Paso Times with a copy of an internal police email where a traffic sergeant complains to officers that not enough citations are being issued as part of a Click-It-or-Ticket seat-belt enforcement grant.

The May 26 email by Sgt. Jack Matthews of the Traffic Division stated "the performance standard set forth in the grant is a minimum of three seat-belt violations per hour of work per officer. If you think that you cannot meet this goal during your five-hour shift, then do not work the grant ... those that do not produce what is required will not be considered to work any traffic-related grants in the future."

Matthews was a past grant administrator, according to city documents, and retired Aug. 20, about the time the grants investigation was under way. Matthews has not been accused of wrongdoing.

Leeds said the email is proof that a quota system, though using a different name, is used by the Police Department in violation of state law.

"This proves this is all about money," Leeds said. "It is not about law enforcement and criminal justice. The people of El Paso are being hunted" for traffic citations.

Police and city officials denied the allegations. Police officials have said performance standards are not a quota system.

"These attorneys are representing their clients who resigned voluntarily in lieu of termination," Wilson said in a statement.

"The El Paso Police Department does not have a quota system and the issue at hand has nothing to do with quotas -- it has to do with falsifying time records. The lawsuit is without merit and our legal team is preparing a response."

Daniel Borunda may be reached at dborunda@elpasotimes.com; 546-6102.

Mr Fiddlesticks raided by cops for toons

Cartoonist Targeted With Criminal Probe For Mocking Police

RENTON, Wash. -- The Renton City Prosecutor wants to send a cartoonist to jail for mocking the police department in a series of animated Internet videos.

The "South-Park"-style animations parody everything from officers having sex on duty to certain personnel getting promoted without necessary qualifications. While the city wants to criminalize the cartoons, First Amendment rights advocates say the move is an "extreme abuse of power."



Only KIRO Team 7 Investigative Reporter Chris Halsne holds a key document that really lays bare the city’s intent. The document was quietly filed in King County Superior Court last week. It’s a search warrant accusing an anonymous cartoon creator, going by the name of Mr. Fiddlesticks, of cyberstalking (RCW 9.61.260). The Renton Police Department and the local prosecutor got a judge to sign off as a way to uncover the name of whoever is behind the parodies. Halsne talked with three nationally respected legal experts who believe the use of the cyberstalking statute is likely stomping on the constitution.

The series of web-based short cartoons feature a mustachioed street cop and a short-haired female bureaucrat. The dry, at times, witty banter between the two touches on some embarrassing insider secrets, some of which seem to match up with internal affairs investigations on file within Renton PD.

UNCUT: Job Tips Parody [Warning: Profanity]
UNCUT: Promotion Parody
UNCUT: Reprimand Parody
UNCUT: Lawyer Parody
UNCUT: Locker Room Parody
UNCUT: Jail Parody

Cartoon Character of Officer: "Is there any reason why an anonymous video, with no identifying information that ties it to the department or city is being taken more seriously than officers having sex on duty, arguing with outside agencies while in a drunken stupor off duty, sleeping while on duty, throwing someone off a bridge, and having inappropriate relationships with coworkers and committing adultery?"

Cartoon Character of Bureaucrat: "The reason is that internal dirt is internal. The department will crucify certain people and take care of others."



A criminal court document, uncovered by Team 7 Investigators, not only shows how badly the city of Renton wants to "out" the cartoonist (who goes by the name MrFiddlesticks), but states some of the fake character's lines discuss real life incidents.

For example, the search warrant says one cartoon statement "discussed a past incident that has already been investigated…..regarding a dating relationship (a female detective) had with a suspect." An embarrassing revelation; yes, but criminal?

We asked attorney Venkat Balasubramani to review several parody videos and the court documents. He's an expert in cyber-law and constitutional issues.



“The cyberstalking angle doesn't pass the laugh test," Balasubramani told KIRO-TV. "It's a serious stretch and I'd be surprised if somebody looked at it and realistically thought these acts actually fit the statute and we could make somebody criminally liable."

When we asked about the more likely scenario, Balasubramani said, "I think they were trying to get at the speaker and they looked around for a statute that shoehorned their conduct into and sent that to Google and said ‘turn over the information.”

Historically, Google and You-Tube are far more likely to cough up an anonymous animator's real name when there's a criminal case, as opposed to just an internal affairs investigation into some personnel issues.



KIRO Team 7 Investigators went to the City Attorney's office to ask the chief prosecutor, Shawn Arthur, his motivations to criminalize cartoon creators. Halsne was told to leave a handwritten note. We did not hear back from Arthur. A similar thing happened at the Renton police department. A spokesperson told Halsne that Chief Kevin Milosevich was unavailable.



Team 7 Investigators, however, did track down Penny Bartley. She’s a former Renton Police Public Information Officer and current jail administrator, which court records say is the female bureaucrat in some of the cartoons.

The mystery animator makes fun of her ankles and questions her resume, yet Bartley wouldn’t talk about the parodies, except to say the city prosecutor never contacted her regarding the filing of a criminal warrant.



Halsne: "The video is insulting to you. Can't you at least step out and talk about how that makes you feel?"

Bartley: "I'm not going to talk about that."

Halsne: "So you're not offended?"

Bartley: "I'm not going to comment on this Chris, I've said that."

KIRO-TV found two of the full parodies still hanging around the web (which are now posted on our site), but police said there were 6 or 7 additional cartoons created with animation software at www.xtranorma.com and posted under a pseudonyms. KIRO-TV has since obtained four more videos.

When KIRO 7 Eyewitness News asked for comment from the city, we were told that there is a point person in charge of comments, and that person is on vacation in Canada.

View search warrant

Comments:

The pigs and prosecutors shouldn't be parodied; they should be pulverized.

Way to go City of Renton, you have hit the DrudgeReport! Not only does the city look foolish to Washington State but now you look foolish to the world!!! Try covering up your dirty laundry now!

Trackday events at Nashville Superspeedway cancelled in 2012?

Download the full 2-hour documentary by The Dragonater

UPDATE: Kia copies The Dragonater in new TV advert at NSS

European tracks run their own test days 5 days every week and races every weekend, with weekly driver schools located at every track, and industrial units leased to pro teams and manufacturers year round. All tracks have free pit garages, doors included. Prices are cheap and open to the general public -- no country clubs allowed. American tracks should take note, if they want to survive. This BS is why the Dragonater moved to England to race on TV for 8 years, where I had 12 road courses within a 3-hour drive.


The Dragonater's first bike trackday was the Final STT event at NSS?


Download of the full 2-hour documentary available for download at Archive.org

Nashville Superspeedway Will Not Seek NASCAR Races

GLADEVILLE, Tenn. – The Nashville Superspeedway has announced it will not seek NASCAR races for the 2012 season. The speedway's owner made the announcement Wednesday morning.

Dover Motorsports, which owns the speedway in Wilson County, said it has notified NASCAR that it will not seek any race sanctions for 2012.


Why build a race track out of bumpy concrete?

It appears the track will be shutting down next year, and there's a possibility it won't be re-opening.

The company has been trying unsuccessfully to secure a NASCAR Sprint Cup race since 2001 and superspeedway general manager Cliff Hawks said the track cannot continue without a date, despite what he calls a strong Nashville market.

The decision effectively ends the Nationwide Series and Camping World Truck Series from visiting the 1.33-mile concrete track any longer.


Pay no attention to that oil light

The company can't get any of the really big NASCAR races here, and they are not making enough money to keep the gates open.

Dover opened the 1.33-mile track 10 years ago. The superspeedway has hosted NASCAR trucks and Nationwide races and also had a slot on the Indy Racing League schedule before losing that after the 2008 season.


Dragonater cruising at highway speeds on NSS

"Nashville is a tremendous market filled with passionate race fans. We have some extremely dedicated and talented employees who have made this track a great destination, but the reality is, after ten years of effort, we have to face the fact that without a Sprint Cup race and/or a significant change in the operating model for other events, we simply cannot continue," said Cliff Hawks, Vice President and General Manager of Nashville Superspeedway.

This year Nashville hosted a pair of truck series-Nationwide Series doubleheader weekends. Both were poorly attended.


Did Bristol kill NSS?

Events already on the schedule for the remainder of 2011 will not be impacted by the announcement.

The Nashville Superspeedway sits on 1,400 acres near Route 840, near Gladeville in Wilson County, south of Lebanon.

Owners said the concrete superspeedway has 25,000 permanent grandstand seats, lights for nighttime racing, foundation work for a dirt track, short track and drag strip and infrastructure in place to expand to 150,000 seats.

Nashville Off NASCAR Schedule For 2012

"We deeply appreciate all the hard work that our employees have put into making Nashville Superspeedway such a remarkable facility," said Denis McGlynn, President & CEO of Dover Motorsports. "We have also had years of unrelenting support from state, county and local officials and from the racing community – from racing fans and drivers to sponsors, team owners and various sanctioning bodies."

McGlynn said Dover Motorsports was evaluating options for the track, including a possible sale.

The Wilson County Sports Authority issued bonds in 1999 for almost $26 million for public infrastructure improvements at the site. Dover Motorsports said $21 million remained outstanding, the company's letter of credit would be drawn if taxes were insufficient to pay the bond.



The Nashville news comes on the heels of last weekend's Lucas Oil Raceway races that could have been the final visits by NASCAR's number two and three divisions to that Indianapolis-area short track. Next season the Nationwide Series will join the Brickyard 400 and a Rolex Grand Am Sports Car race at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway in what's being billed as a "Super Weekend" at IMS.

There are also reports Montreal, an event promoted by International Speedway Corporation, will also leave the schedule next season after the Nationwide Series' visit there later this month.

According the CBS Sports, the series could return to the historic Nashville Fairgrounds Speedway, where both divisions raced for years before moving to the Nashville Superspeedway. Former Nationwide Series driver Bobby Hamilton Jr. is now the promoter of the downtown track and has worked hard to resurrect racing at the storied facility.

CBS Sports contributed to this report.

SportbikeTrackTime.com

STT Forum - Nashville Superspeedway to close


The Dragonater leads the Novice School Class at NSS


Dodging potholes, tar snakes, flat curbs and spooky banking transitions


Daylight photos by US129photos.com


Hot tearing on corner entry due to engine compression braking and lack of slipper clutch (none available for Daytona 600?). Ken Wheeler was unable to raise idle speed to 3500 rpm using TuneECU software for the first time in dyno tune. Rear spring is also at least 1 size too stiff for body weight according to Race Tech.










Final STT event at NSS?


NashvilleSuperspeedway.com - Entire website is deleted, replaced with Memorial RIP. Built with $25-million in taxpayer funds, you can probably buy a nice race track cheap...


Copyright Flint Adam Fotografie

Dyno tune at Wheelers

Full results and review

Trackday results

NC bans driver licenses for 45 mph on the Dragon

Smallest Offenses Can Pose Huge Problems

Most people think of a traffic citation as little more than an annoyance that can generally be taken care of through the expenditure of a little bit of time and a couple hundred dollars. For some individuals, a traffic citation can lead to a mandatory appearance at a location far from that person's home or potentially harsh penalties that can result in the loss of one's driving privileges if the ticket is not handled properly.

For example, the State of North Carolina is notorious for having strict driving laws, including the potential suspension of a resident's license if he or she is cited in any state for speeding in excess of fifteen miles per hour over the speed limit. Such citations are routinely written to North Carolina residents who are traveling in Tennessee counties such as Cocke County, Greene County, Sevier County, and other counties that sit along the North Carolina border. Given the strict driving laws that are in place in that state, many North Carolina residents simply cannot afford to have points placed on their license or risk pleading guilty to an excessive speeding charge.

It is also important to remember that many counties will look at a person's driving history in deciding whether to give an individual a break on a ticket. For this reason, it is important for drivers to maintain a clean record, as even one small violation in the past three or four years can spell doom for drivers hoping to catch a break in some Tennessee counties.

If you are facing potentially harsh consequences or a mandatory appearance far from home as a result of a traffic citation, contact an experienced East Tennessee Traffic Ticket Attorney who can assist you in getting the matter resolved.

---

North Carolina to Seize Speeding Cars [and Bikes] That Fail to Pull Over

Police to seize and sell motorcycles and cars accused of eluding arrest.

Beginning December 1, North Carolina will join Australia in having laws on the book mandating the seizure of vehicles for certain speeding offenses. On June 23, Governor Bev Perdue (D) signed the "Run and You're Done" bill into law which authorizes a county sheriff to take and hold the car of anyone accused -- not convicted -- of speeding away from a police officer. The state House and Senate passed the measure unanimously.

Under the new law, the confiscation becomes permanent if a judge believes the car or motorcycle was used to elude a police officer while speeding more than 15 MPH over the limit with at least one other aggravating factor, such as having someone under 12 years old in the vehicle or the vehicle was at some point in a highway work zone, regardless of whether any workers are present.

Such charges could apply to drivers who have done nothing seriously wrong. In 2009, a Minnesota State rammed the minivan of a man accused of not using his turn signal, then arrested him for "eluding police" because he took less than a minute to find a place to pull over that was not covered in snow. He had his three small children in the car at the time. In 2008, a woman drove less than 10 MPH over the limit followed the general advice of waiting to find a well-lit area before pulling over. She was arrested by Greene County, Missouri police and only escaped charges when the incident hit the news.

Conviction under "Run and You're Done" brings revenue to the police agency responsible for the seizure. The entity responsible for selling the vehicle will keep seizure fees, storage fees and sales fees. The remainder of the profit is distributed to the county government like a normal fine.

Under the new law, the vehicle can be seized and sold even if the actual owner of the vehicle is unaware of its use for speeding. Police only need to place a legal advertisement in a newspaper on two occasions and paste up three handbills near the place of seizure before selling the car. The process can be done in 24 days. A court clerk has the discretion to release a car to anyone he believes might be an "innocent owner."

A special provision forbids the sale of highly modified performance vehicles. These, instead, are to be "turned over to such governmental agency or public official within the territorial jurisdiction of the court as the court shall see fit, to be used in the performance of official duties only."

A copy of the legislation is available in a 70k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: House Bill 427 (North Carolina General Assembly, 6/23/2011)

---

NASCAR driver Kyle Busch loses driver's license


NASCAR points leader Kyle Busch has had his driver's license suspended in a case stemming from his high-speed joy ride in a luxury car.

Busch pleaded guilty to speeding and no contest to reckless and careless driving in North Carolina District Court in Iredell County on Tuesday. In addition to losing his license for 45 days, he also was fined $1,000, sentenced to 30 hours of community service and put on one year of unsupervised probation.

Busch, who doesn't need a license to compete in NASCAR, was stopped May 24 while driving 128 mph in a 45 mph zone in a bright yellow 2012 Lexus. The hand-built LFA sports car is valued at nearly $400,000 and was on loan to Busch from Lexus.

The Dragonater drives 130 mph for 3 hours nonstop in tight formation with commuter traffic, 100% legal, on public highways with a speed limit over 250 mph, as seen on History Channel.

---

"Mr. Speaker, my subject today is whether America is a police state. Terror and fear are used to achieve complacency and obedience, especially when citizens are deluded into believing they are still a free people. Most police states, surprisingly, come about through the democratic process with majority support. The masses are easily led to believe that security and liberty are mutually exclusive, and demand for security far exceeds that for liberty. Our government already keeps close tabs on just about everything we do and requires official permission for nearly all of our activities. One might take a look at our Capitol for any evidence of a police state. We see: barricades, metal detectors, police, military soldiers at times, dogs, ID badges required for every move, vehicles checked at airports and throughout the Capitol. The people are totally disarmed, except for the police and the criminals. But worse yet, surveillance cameras in Washington are everywhere to ensure our safety. The personal information of law-abiding citizens can be used for reasons other than safety- including political reasons. Like gun control, people control hurts law-abiding citizens much more than the law-breakers. Social Security numbers are used to monitor our daily activities. The numbers are given at birth, and then are needed when we die and for everything in between. Centralized control and regulations are required in a police state. Almost all of our economic activities depend upon receiving the proper permits from the federal government. Transactions involving guns, food, medicine, smoking, drinking, hiring, firing, wages, politically correct speech, land use, fishing, hunting, buying a house, business mergers and acquisitions, selling stocks and bonds, and farming all require approval and strict regulation from our federal government. If this is not done properly and in a timely fashion, economic penalties and even imprisonment are likely consequences. Because government pays for much of our health care, it's conveniently argued that any habits or risk-taking that could harm one's health are the prerogative of the federal government, and are to be regulated by explicit rules to keep medical-care costs down. This same argument is used to require helmets for riding motorcycles and bikes. Not only do we need a license to drive, but we also need special belts, bags, buzzers, seats and environmentally dictated speed limits- or a policemen will be pulling us over to levy a fine, and he will be toting a gun for sure. Over 80,000 federal bureaucrats now carry guns to make us toe the line and to enforce the thousands of laws and tens of thousands of regulations that no one can possibly understand. All 18-year-old males must register to be ready for the next undeclared war. If they don't, men with guns will appear and enforce this congressional mandate. "Involuntary servitude" was banned by the 13th Amendment, but courts don't apply this prohibition to the servitude of draftees or those citizens required to follow the dictates of the IRS- especially the employers of the country, who serve as the federal government's chief tax collectors and information gatherers. Fear is the tool used to intimidate most Americans to comply to the tax code by making examples of celebrities. When the government keeps detailed records on every move we make and we either need advance permission for everything we do or are penalized for not knowing what the rules are, America will be declared a police state. In a free society, the government's job is simply to protect liberty- the people do the rest. Let's not give up on a grand experiment that has provided so much for so many. Let's reject the police state."

—Congressman Ron Paul, candidate for president in 2008, U.S. House of Representatives, Is America a Police State? June 27, 2002

Psycho cop threatens murder for parking ticket

“I could blast you right in the mouth. I tell you what I should have done. As soon as I saw your gun, I should have taken two steps back, pulled my Glock 40, and just put 10 bullets in your ass and let you drop. And I wouldn’t have lost any sleep. I am so close to caving in your God damn head. It’s how fucking cops get killed.”
-Officer Daniel Harless, Canton Ohio Police Dept

Video Shows Psycho Cop Threaten Murder During Arrest

Fox News
21 July 2011

An Ohio police officer is being widely criticized for a threatening rant caught on his dashboard camera during a recent arrest.



The June 8, 2011 video, which was obtained by a gun rights group [OhioCCW.org], shows a Canton police officer grow irate after he indicates that the driver of a stopped vehicle waited too long to inform him of his concealed gun, even though he had a proper permit to carry it.

“I could blast you right in the mouth,” the officer said. “I am so close to caving in your God damn head.”

“It’s how fucking cops get killed.”

Once inside the police car, the officer continues the rant, saying, “I tell you what I should have done. As soon as I saw your gun, I should have taken two steps back, pulled my Glock 40, and just put 10 bullets in your ass and let you drop. And I wouldn’t have lost any sleep.”

The Canton Repository identified the police officer as Daniel Harless and reported that he was placed on administrative leave in June, and has most recently been on sick leave. The department is investigating the incident.

Approaching a car is one of the more stressful tasks a police officer can perform. Some states, like Ohio, have laws that mandate prompt notification of a concealed carry permit when stopped by police.

In this case, the driver William Bartlett, who had the permit for a month, appears to make attempts in the video at telling the police officer about his weapon, but is cut off by the arresting officer, his lawyer said.

He was arrested and charged with both a traffic violation and failure to notify a police officer about a concealed weapon, two misdemeanors, Timothy Bellew, his lawyer, said. He was released the same night.

Bellew provided Ohioans For Concealed Carry, a group in which he’s a member, with the video of the arrest because he said that it vindicates his client.

“You see on at least two occasions my client tries to inform the cops about his concealed weapon, but get’s cut off,” he said. “And then he goes off very unprofessionally.”

Chris Harben, the compliance coordinator for Ohioans For Concealed Carry, said the group has many members in law enforcement and none said the cop handled the situation correctly.

Canton Police Chief Dean McKimm was also critical of the actions seen in the video.

“I think it’s important for citizens to understand that the behavior demonstrated on the video is wholly unacceptable, and it violates many of our rules, our regulations and standards we demand of our officers,” McKimm said, according to The Repository.

---

Cops aren't driven insane by citizens with guns, cops are driven insane by making a career out of robbing people at gunpoint.

The cop heard round the world: Ohio incident puts law in crosshairs

Not only is a Canton, Ohio police officer under increasing fire this morning for his profanity-laden outburst at an armed citizen that now has gun rights activists from Toledo to Tacoma furious, the Buckeye State law that requires citizens to notify cops if they are armed is also being partly blamed for what happened during a video encounter that has streaked around the world over the past 24 hours.

The incident, discussed by this column yesterday, ignited a firestorm on the Northwest Firearms and WaGuns forums, plus Open Carry.org, GunRightsMedia and The High Road, with sentiment decidedly against the cop, and sympathetic toward the armed citizen, now identified as William Bartlett. This 17-minute video has set public relations back about 50 years between Canton police and the firearms community.

A prime example of this setback is a column by Robert Flynn appearing on Gather today. Flynn observes:

"While most police officers respect a person's right to carry a concealed weapon, there are some who just refuse to accept it. Concealed carry is the law in Ohio and police officers must come to accept it. Most seem to be able to face this situation without losing their composure, but officer Harless's reaction is indicative of a larger societal problem. Some in our society just refuse to accept that guns are legal and necessary…

Officer Harless's actions seem to show the dangers that can come about when police refuse to respect a citizen's right to carry a concealed weapon. The driver could have easily believed that officer Harless meant him harm, at which point violence could have ensued.

If someone is going to threaten to arbitrarily kill American citizens, is this not what the right to self-protection is all about? Many see the right to bear arms as the founding father's way to make sure that the ordinary citizen always had the ability to resist a tyrannical government. And is not a police officer arbitrarily threatening to kill ordinary citizens the ultimate example of tyranny?"

Bad enough for Canton Police Chief Dean McKimm and the now-off-the-streets cop, Daniel Harless that the video rant is big news on local Ohio television, here, here and here, but the story also made national news on Fox. So far, Harless appears to be remaining silent; something he probably should have done on the night of June 8 when he and a partner pulled up behind the parked car in which Bartlett was seated behind the wheel. It has not been clear exactly what Bartlett was doing that night, parked at the curb, with two other people, but on the video, while he is being threatened with felony arrest and summary execution, he displays a considerable amount of grace under fire.

But what about this Ohio requirement to immediately notify a police officer if you are legally armed? In Bartlett’s case, the video shows him apparently trying to do that at least twice, only to be ignored or told to “shut up” by Harless. Bartlett can be seen holding both his driver’s license and his concealed pistol permit, trying to inform Harless of his gun without opening his mouth.

Ohioans for a Concealed Carry say the officer was way out of line.

The advocacy group also says the state's law is a problem.

"The notification law fails everybody," says Philip Mulivor, a coordinator of the group.

Mulivor says Ohio should follow the lead of some other states and require officers to ask if there is a legal gun in the car, rather than requiring the driver to say it first.

Here in Washington State, there is no such requirement. Smart cops, state troopers and sheriff’s deputies approach everyone as if they are armed. That’s probably a good assumption, considering that there are more than 370,000 Evergreen State citizens who are licensed to carry, and in the case of Open Carry activists, lawmen can tell at a glance if they are packing.

And what if they are? As Open Carry activists have found in various jurisdictions, depending upon the individual policeman, encounters can range from good to not so good. It is all a matter of attitude, which, in the case of Canton cop Harless, seems to have started out bad and gone downhill from there.

Only a few states require armed citizens to notify an officer if they are armed.

Why should they? Gun rights activists believe that if an armed citizen is minding his own business and not creating a disturbance, what he’s carrying, concealed or openly, is nobody else’s business. There is a quirk in this state's law that has created problems:

(1) It shall be unlawful for any person to carry, exhibit, display, or draw any firearm, dagger, sword, knife or other cutting or stabbing instrument, club, or any other weapon apparently capable of producing bodily harm, in a manner, under circumstances, and at a time and place that either manifests an intent to intimidate another or that warrants alarm for the safety of other persons.

However, that quirk is not insurmountable, and a state court of appeals ruling appears to narrow it considerably. The ruling, unfortunately, remains unpublished. The case is State v. Casad, and this is what the State Court of Appeals, Division II said:

We note that, in connection with this case, several individuals have commented that they would find it strange, maybe shocking, to see a man carrying a gun down the street in broad daylight. Casad’s appellate counsel conceded that she would personally react with shock, but she emphasized that an individual’s lack of comfort with firearms does not equate to reasonable alarm. We agree. It is not unlawful for a person to responsibly walk down the street with a visible firearm, even if this action would shock some people. (emphasis added)

Harless is now on “administrative leave” and he also reportedly went on sick leave earlier this week. Gun owners reacting to the video say he should be fired and prosecuted. Canton Chief McKimm has promised a full investigation, but many gun owners predict that he will get a “slap on the hand” followed by some additional training, and a return to duty. As retired Cincinnati Police Lt. Harry Thomas, who has offered to be an expert witness for the defense if Bartlett – now charged with a misdemeanor traffic infraction and failure to notify a police officer about his concealed handgun – is ultimately prosecuted, that video will follow Harless. It could run him right out of a job.

The question among angry gun rights activists today: How many more like Harless are still out there, not yet captured on video?

See also:

Concealed Carry Laws posted by Ohio Attorney General

Handgun Concealed Carry Laws in Tennessee

Handgun Open Carry Laws in Tennessee

Tennessee Attorney General Opinion on Handgun Open Carry

Handgun Concealed Carry Laws in North Carolina

Handgun Open Carry Laws in North Carolina

---

A Dallas police officer is on administrative leave after authorities said she fired off her gun while off-duty in a squad car with at least one on-duty officer.

The call came in at around 11:30 p.m. Wednesday night, which was when police rushed to the scene at Abrams Road and Gaston Avenue and found three officers at the scene.

Police said the incident happened after Kelly Beemer, an off-duty officer who police said had a few drinks, had gotten into a squad car of an on-duty police officer. Beemer allegedly pulled out her service weapon from her holster and fired the gun into the floorboard. Sources said she was belligerent at the time. Part of the incident was captured on audio tape from a dash cam camera.

"You need to stop this [expletive] now," Beemer can be heard saying on the tape before a gun fires.

"Oh [expletive], Kelly please drop the gun," an officer in the car said. "Kelly, drop the gun."

Prior to the incident, video from the dash cam showed two officers holding a stumbling Beemer up by her arms as they walked her towards the squad car. Throughout the drive, authorities said Beemer cried and acted belligerent, believing she was under arrest.

Sources said the on-duty officer driving the squad car was originally called to the bar where Beemer and other officers had been drinking. Prior to being picked up, Beemer was allegedly offered rides from other officers at the bar, and at one point ran and hid from officers, sources said.

Commanders were called to the scene, but did not arrest Beemer at the time, saying she was too drunk to be interviewed. It wasn't until they viewed the tape that they decided to arrest and charge Beemer.

"We are disappointed in her behavior there," said First Asst. Chief Charles Cato, Dallas Police Department. "I know I receive calls from friends, relatives who had a little too much to drink and needed a ride home, and all the people I've dealt with in that situation were just grateful that someone was willing to come out and pick them up. And so, in Officer Beemer's conduct, that was certainly a discredit to herself and to the people that were trying to help her. She put them in a really bad situation."

No officers were injured in the incident.

Beemer was arrested Thursday and charged with firing a weapon inside the city limits. If convicted, Beemer will lose her peace officer's license. Meanwhile, she has been stripped of her weapon and badge until the investigation is complete. Two other officers are on restrictive duty as police investigate their role in the incident.

COP.
2. to steal; filch. 3. to buy (narcotics). 4. cop out, a. to avoid one's responsibility, the fulfillment of a promise, etc.; renege; back out. 5. cop a plea, a. to plead guilty or confess in return for receiving a lighter sentence. b. to plead guilty to a lesser charge; plea-bargain."
-Random House Unabridged Dictionary

NC to seize bikes for traffic tickets, no conviction required

What do you expect in Blackwater NC, where you get the death penalty for drinking alcohol?

"Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted."
-Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Police to seize and sell motorcycles and cars accused of eluding arrest

14 Jul 2011

Beginning December 1, North Carolina will join Australia in having laws on the book mandating the seizure of vehicles for certain speeding offenses. On June 23, Governor Bev Perdue (D) signed the “Run and You’re Done” bill into law which authorizes a county sheriff to take and hold the car of anyone accused — not convicted — of speeding away from a police officer. The state House and Senate passed the measure unanimously.

Under the new law, the confiscation becomes permanent if a judge believes the car or motorcycle was used to elude a police officer while speeding more than 15 MPH over the limit with at least one other aggravating factor, such as having someone under 12 years old in the vehicle or the vehicle was at some point in a highway work zone, regardless of whether any workers are present.

Such charges could apply to drivers who have done nothing seriously wrong. In 2009, a Minnesota State trooper rammed the minivan of a man accused of not using his turn signal, then arrested him for “eluding police” because he took less than a minute to find a place to pull over that was not covered in snow. He had his three small children in the car at the time.

In 2008, a woman drove less than 10 MPH over the limit followed the general advice of waiting to find a well-lit area before pulling over. She was arrested by Greene County, Missouri police and only escaped charges when the incident hit the news.

Conviction under “Run and You’re Done” brings revenue to the police agency responsible for the seizure. The entity responsible for selling the vehicle will keep seizure fees, storage fees and sales fees. The remainder of the profit is distributed to the county government like a normal fine.

Under the new law, the vehicle can be seized and sold even if the actual owner of the vehicle is unaware of its use for speeding. Police only need to place a legal advertisement in a newspaper on two occasions and paste up three handbills near the place of seizure before selling the car. The process can be done in 24 days. A court clerk has the discretion to release a car to anyone he believes might be an “innocent owner.”

A special provision forbids the sale of highly modified performance vehicles. These, instead, are to be “turned over to such governmental agency or public official within the territorial jurisdiction of the court as the court shall see fit, to be used in the performance of official duties only.”

---

NC HB 427

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA
SESSION 2011
SESSION LAW 2011-271

HOUSE BILL 427

*H427-v-7*

AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE SEIZURE, FORFEITURE, AND SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLES USED BY DEFENDANTS IN FELONY CASES INVOLVING SPEEDING TO ELUDE ARREST.

The General Assembly of North Carolina enacts:
SECTION 1. G.S. 20-141.5 reads as rewritten:
"§ 20-141.5. Speeding to elude arrest.

(f) Each law enforcement agency shall adopt a policy applicable to the pursuit of fleeing or eluding motorists. Each policy adopted pursuant to this subsection shall specifically include factors to be considered by an officer in determining when it is advisable to break off a chase to stop and apprehend a suspect. to initiate or terminate a pursuit. The Attorney General shall develop a model policy or policies to be considered for use by law enforcement agencies.

(g) If a person is arrested for a felony violation under this section, then the law enforcement agency shall seize the motor vehicle and deliver the same to the sheriff of the county in which such offense is committed, or the same shall be placed under said sheriff's constructive possession if delivery of actual possession is impractical, and the vehicle shall be held by the sheriff pending the trial of the person or persons operating such motor vehicle and charged with a felony offense under this section.

(1) The sheriff shall restore the seized motor vehicle to the owner upon execution by the owner of a good and valid bond, with sufficient sureties, in an amount double the value of the property, which bond shall be approved by said sheriff and shall be conditioned on the return of the motor vehicle to the custody of the sheriff on the day of trial of the person or persons accused. Upon an acquittal or dismissal of any felony charge under this section, the sheriff shall return the motor vehicle to the owner thereof.

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions for sale set out in subsection (h) of this section, on petition by a lienholder, the court, in its discretion and upon such terms and conditions as it may prescribe, may allow reclamation of the vehicle by the lienholder. The lienholder shall file with the court an accounting of the proceeds of any subsequent sale of the vehicle and pay into the court any proceeds received in excess of the amount of the lien.

(h) Upon conviction of the operator of said motor vehicle of a felony offense under this section, the court shall order a sale at public auction of said motor vehicle.

(1) The officer making the sale shall make the following deductions from the sale proceeds:

a. The expenses of keeping the motor vehicle.
b. The fee for the seizure.
c. The costs of the sale.

The officer shall then pay, from the net proceeds, all liens, according to their priorities, which are established by intervention or otherwise at the hearing or in other proceeding brought for said purpose as being bona fide. The officer shall pay the balance of the proceeds to the proper officer of the county who receives fines and forfeitures to be used for the school fund of the county.

(2) All liens against a motor vehicle sold under the provisions of this section shall be transferred from the motor vehicle to the proceeds of its sale.

(3) If, at the time of hearing, or other proceeding in which the matter is considered, the owner of the vehicle can establish to the satisfaction of the court that the provisions of sub-subdivisions a. through c. of this subdivision apply, then the court shall not order a sale of the vehicle but shall restore it to the owner. The owner shall be entitled to a trial by jury upon the issues in this subdivision.
a. The defendant was an immediate member of the owner's family at the time of the offense.

b. The defendant had no previous felony or misdemeanor convictions at the time of the offense and had no previous or pending violations of any provision in Chapter 20 of the General Statutes for the three years previous to the time of the offense.
c. The defendant was under the age of 19 at the time of the offense.

(4) A nondefendant motor vehicle owner may file a petition with the clerk of court seeking a pretrial determination that the petitioner is an innocent owner. The clerk shall consider the petition and make a determination as soon as may be feasible. At any proceeding conducted pursuant to this subdivision, the clerk is not required to determine the issue of forfeiture, only the issue of whether the petitioner is an innocent owner. If the clerk determines that the petitioner is an innocent owner, the clerk shall release the motor vehicle to the petitioner. The clerk shall send a copy of the order authorizing or denying release of the vehicle to the district attorney and the sheriff. An order issued under this subdivision finding that the petitioner failed to establish that the petitioner is an innocent owner may be reconsidered by the court as part of the forfeiture hearing under this section.

(i) If the owner of a motor vehicle seized pursuant to this section cannot be found, the taking of the same, with a description thereof, shall be advertised in some newspaper published in the city or county where taken, or, if there be no newspaper published in such city or county, in a newspaper having circulation in the county, once a week for two weeks and by handbills posted in three public places near the place of seizure, and if said owner shall not appear within 10 days after the last publication of the advertisement, the property shall be sold, or otherwise disposed of in the manner set forth in this section.

(j) When any vehicle confiscated under the provisions of this section is found to be specially equipped or modified from its original manufactured condition so as to increase its speed, the court shall, prior to sale, order that the special equipment or modification be removed and destroyed and the vehicle restored to its original manufactured condition. However, if the court should find that such equipment and modifications are so extensive that it would be impractical to restore said vehicle to its original manufactured condition, then the court may order that the vehicle be turned over to such governmental agency or public official within the territorial jurisdiction of the court as the court shall see fit, to be used in the performance of official duties only, and not for resale, transfer, or disposition other than as junk: Provided, that nothing herein contained shall affect the rights of lienholders and other claimants to said vehicles as set out in this section."

SECTION 2. This act becomes effective December 1, 2011, and applies to offenses committed on or after that date.

In the General Assembly read three times and ratified this the 17th day of June, 2011.

s/ Walter H. Dalton
President of the Senate
s/ Thom Tillis
Speaker of the House of Representatives
s/ Beverly E. Perdue
Governor

Approved 5:06 p.m. this 23rd day of June, 2011