Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Are you a driver?


Is YOUR NAME in ALL CAPS? THP sold fake I.D. to 400,000 illegal aliens exempt from Driver License Internal Passport...

The 5 Words Used to Control / Enslave You

Note: Many well-known freedom movement spokesmen/women have not been willing to fully discuss and expose this subject for reasons known only to them. Why? Because, they either think it is too trivial, they do not fully understand it or perhaps in their mind, it's been debunked by an attorney, whom they give credence to, without doing their own thorough due diligence. It is also important to note that there are some well-intentioned lawyers who strive to assist in making our world a safer and better place for all to live. The intention of this article is to shine a bright light and empower you to help break the matrix grip.

First and foremost, it is vitally important to comprehend that everything in the business / commercial world is done by contract, both public and private. Secondly, relationships are also contractual -- marital, parental and social (friendships). You both consciously and unconsciously verbally contract all day long, and when merited, in written form as well.

Words are understood to be very powerful and it is through spelling that spells are cast. However, it is a very misunderstood fact that words used in everyday language most often do not have the same meaning in a legal sense (contractual or court setting).

What are these 5 words that are used to control / enslave you? Person, resident, citizen, driver and passenger (all commercial terms). In my humble opinion, these 5 words are the keys to casting the spell in the attorneys’ legal jargon trickery. All commercial transactions / contracts have been designed to remove the men and women from the equation and replace with a legal fictional entity in the matrix system.

PERSON is a legal entity - a trust, corporation, partnership, association. Don't be fooled by the attorney's statutory word trickery if you see "natural person". An adjective cannot change the root meaning of a word. Plain and simple, it is impossible to be a "person". You are either a man or woman - a living being. A "person" is a dead entity and attorneys may only represent persons – commercial legal entities.

RESIDENT is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a State (a legal entity). To "reside" is a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes.

CITIZEN is the word term used to establish jurisdiction in a Federal district. It is also a commercial term only used to establish domicile for tax revenue purposes. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) may only tax those people who have voluntarily deemed themselves internal to the district. Thus only legal entities have tax liability.

DRIVER is a For Hire / paid operator of a motor vehicle. The term "motor vehicle" is defined as every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.

PASSENGER is someone who pays a fare for passage on a commercial carrier - airplane, bus, taxi, limousine, cruise ship, train or trolley, rather than a "guest" who travels without charge or fee.

It is necessary to go to the very root when looking at a complex problem. It is obvious that most politicians and their key staff are attorneys/lawyers, who are minions in servitude to the bankers. The simplest solution is to start removing the attorneys from office.

Take note of these quotes:

"In a recent conversation with an official at the Internal Revenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that 'If the taxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operates on 90% bluff, the entire system will collapse'." -- Henry Bellmon, U.S. Senator (1969).

"Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment and voluntary compliance." -- Mortimer Caplin, former Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975).

"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not ... they are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders. The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will." -- Congressman Charles McFadden, Chairman, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932.

"The real truth of the matter is, and you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson. History depicts Andrew Jackson as the last truly honorable and incorruptible American president." -- President Franklin Delano Roosevelt, November 23, 1933 in a letter to Colonel Edward Mandell House.

"... our system of credit is concentrated ... in the hands of a few men .. a power so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that [we had] better not speak above [our] breath when [we] speak in condemnation of it ... We have come to be ... completely controlled ... by ... small groups of dominant men." -- President Woodrow Wilson.

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes" -- Felix Frankfurter, United States Supreme Court Justice.

"Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws." -- Baron M.A. Rothschild (1744 - 1812)

The Solution for unraveling control in the matrix grip:

The NAME = all Capital letter designation - JOHN DOE or JANE DOE is the corporate legal entity = person (also known as - strawman).

This is not a trivial matter. The key to your freedom is to know that you are not this NAME / PERSON. The voluntary act of identifying yourself in a legal contractual setting without proper status declaration will continue your enslavement to the system. You are a living being.

There are 4 ways to respond when offered a contract - acceptance, conditional acceptance, rejection or going silent (acquiescence). The first two choices are honorable and the last two choices are dishonorable.

Why is a judge referred to as Your Honor? – It’s because he/she is weighing who is before him/her and remaining in honor . . . like a mirror and also weighing who will get into argument and therefore acting in dishonor.

Lessons in HONOR AND DISHONOR

You will always lose unless you abide by the rules of the matrix game. You will probably lose even if you use the rules, because you will argue and that is what the "controllers" want you to do, argue. When you argue, you are in dishonor. This is unfortunately how we’ve been conditioned.

Forget about the law. The law is only for those that have violated some tenet of commerce.

Remember, everything in this world is a contract. When you go to the store to purchase a quart of milk, you are about to enter into a contract. When you pick up the milk and pay for it, the clerk will give you a receipt. This receipt is the title to the quart of milk. If you discard the receipt before you leave the store and you leave the store, you could be charged with stealing since you do not have the title to the milk.

You will probably begin to argue. Once you begin to argue, you are in dishonor and when you are in dishonor nothing matters except getting back in honor.

Here is a Biblical story example: Jesus came upon the land to teach people how to operate in commerce. His main purpose was to save us from our dishonor. Yet we persist in this dishonor by acquiring things, which we are treating as little demigods.

One of the best lessons Jesus taught was by his example. On his trip to Galilee, he encountered three beggars, who called out and said "Jesus, heal us"! They were offering Jesus a contract.

There are four possible ways in which to answer when one is offered a contract.

a. Agree to the contract and you are in honor.

b. Remain silent (is consider insolent) and therefore you are in dishonor.

c. To argue about the contract is a dishonor. That is why the courts want you to have an attorney. Attorneys argue and get you in dishonor. They are there to turn you in!

d. Doing a novation is like bargaining and it is a conditional acceptance. For example, if a merchant is selling apples for one dollar each and you want an apple, but you don't want to pay a dollar, you may offer fifty cents. This is bartering, not dishonor and you are remaining in honor. You have just placed the merchant in the position of having to make one of the same four choices on how to answer. You will probably walk away and he will lose the sale if he declines by arguing or remaining silent. He lost because he dishonored you. He remains in honor if he chooses 'd'.

Getting back to the lesson. The beggars offered Jesus a contract. Jesus replied, “What would you have me do?” He is now doing a novation to the contract. Before he can comply, he has to know what the contract requires. The beggars then re-offered the contract to Jesus by saying, "make us see". He then agreed by saying, "you are healed". The beggars and Jesus were always in honor and the contract was completed and everyone was satisfied.

In a court setting, you should re-offer the Judge, by stating: Your Honor, I conditionally accept your offer to give you a NAME upon Proof of Claim that if I do so, it will not bind me to any contract with the State of XYZ (whatever jurisdiction you are supposedly in). The judge will keep trying to get you into contract. You must continue to conditionally accepting the judge’s offer by continually repeating, upon Proof of whatever Claim they are making.

The case is The State of XXY v. JOHN DOE. The judge asks you…How do you plead, Guilty or Not Guilty? or he may say Responsible or Not Responsible? Your answer: Your honor, I conditionally accept your offer to plead upon Proof of Claim that the State of XYX is an injured or the State of XYZ and I have a contract and upon Proof of Claim that the XYZ on the complaint, in all upper case letters is not a legal fiction and upon Proof of Claim that, I, a living being, am a corporation.

PRESUMPTION

The people of the courts and all levels of government presume that you are a corporation because all courts and governments are legal fictions and following the law of like kind can only deal with other legal fictions or incompetent persons. All government codes/statutes (laws) deal only with persons, corporations, trusts, partnerships or other like entities. They are not real. They only exist on paper (in form). They do not exist in the physical sense (substance).

A city, a county and a state have lines drawn on a map that show (what they claim to be) their jurisdiction. There are buildings that are referred to as schools, courts, offices and other titles. They are real because they are made with gravel, cement, wood and other physical materials. The government is a fiction created from a man's imagination. It is of course not real, and only an image in people's minds. It cannot do anything without the physical man. The physical man has a "go between" and that "go between" is a legal fiction. It is a transmitting utility. Just like the electric power company manufactures electrical power for business or home use, the transmission lines are the transmitting utility that connects them together. The person - legal entity - strawman - all capital letter name fictional corporation is the transmitting utility between the flesh and blood man and the government and its agencies.

Presumption comes into play when you receive a contract from the government, a police officer, court, etc., and if you do not correct them, they will presume that you are the all capital letter NAME - legal entity. It is when you don't correct them that the presumption becomes a stipulation of fact.

STIPULATION

A stipulation is an agreement that the facts of the case are not in dispute and therefore will not and cannot be addressed from the point of stipulation. The way that you get into a contract is by doing something that you may be unaware of . . . like a drivers license. You are offering the State to allow you to operate a vehicle in a commercial venture on the roadways within the State, when you apply for a driver’s license.

Whomever offers the contract has the energy or the power because they are the Creditor. The one who is being offered the contract is the Debtor. You always want to be the Creditor. Now, while you are operating the vehicle in commerce, you violate a rule (law) that you agreed to abide by accepting the license.

You were the Creditor when you applied for a license, and were in honor. They were the Debtor. Then they re-offered you the license, making them the Creditor and you the Debtor. Everyone is still in honor when you accepted the license (contract). When you violate some rule (law), you are in dishonor and have to go to a hearing (court). Once again, you are going through the same rules. Honor and dishonor.

CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE

Condition yourself to remember that everything is a contract. When somebody offers you a contract and you do not like the terms, simply re-offer or counter-offer. When a debt collector sends a letter / a collection notice that is a contract. You now have the choices of a, b, c, and d. What are you going to do? The thing not to do is argue or remain silent. You must re-offer in a timely manner.

"Mr. Debt Collector, I conditionally accept your offer to pay the debt indicated, upon Proof of Claim that you are the owner of the debt and upon Proof of Claim that you and I have a signed contract.

When a police officer pulls you over and offers you a ticket for speeding, the ticket is a contract. When he asks you to sign the ticket, stating that you promise to appear at a certain date, that is a contract. You may properly do two things.

1. You may demand that the police officer takes you to a Judge/Magistrate immediately or;

2. You may sign the ticket: All rights reserved, UCC 1-308, and then sign the Name below what you just wrote on the ticket. This action allows you 72 hours to rescind the contract. A widely recognized and universal law of commerce is that contracts can be canceled within 72 hours. Many contracts include a document titled "notice of rescission." The buyer, in most cases, must execute / sign and date the document and get it into the possession of the seller in order to properly rescind the sale.

If you are arrested and taken before a Magistrate, he/she will ask you to state your Name. The Magistrate is making you an offer to enter their jurisdiction. Next you will be invited to sign the paper the clerk offers you. You will be in a contract if you sign it.

Remember, if you are about to go into court, it is vitally important to declare that you are not a corporation prior to a hearing or trial. Otherwise, the judge will find your silence on that point a fact and then proceed under the presumption that you are a corporation.

Please remember, you are not a Name. You are a very powerful living being when in honor.




Your Constitutional Right to Travel, by Police Officer Jack McLamb, Georgia legislature and the US Supreme Court

How to prove your winning case


Lady Justice is blind and naked

by Dr. Frederick D. Graves, JD, attorney at law
Jurisdictionary.com

Since 1997, when Jurisdictionary began showing people "How to Win in Court", we've received tens of thousands of emails requesting help ... and most of them from people who would have lost but for our help.

The problem is "assuming" what it takes to win just gets folks into courtroom trouble!

It's certainly reasonable to assume, if the facts and law are on your side, that you should win in court!

The reality is, however: That's "Just Not True!

Facts and Law are not enough to win!

You must PROVE your winning case!

People have a hard time with this concept.

It does seem reasonable, if one knows the facts and knows the law that the court should rule in your favor.

But! That's not how our courts work!

In an "adversarial system" like ours, both sides compete to see which can pile the most "admissible evidence" into the court's official record. The one with the greater weight of "admissible evidence" wins.

Notice "admissible evidence" is not "FACTS".

A fact may be a fact, a certain, undeniable fact, and yet not be admissible evidence!

To be admissible, a fact must be:

relevant,
reliable,
competent,
not privileged, and
in compliance with other rules, etc.


To imagine one can march into court with "facts" and get justice, demanding, "The law is on my side," is to imagine something that simply is not true!

The PROOF is in the PROVING!

And, proving can only be done by "admissible evidence".

Too many good people lose simply because they do not yet know what is "admissible" and what is not!

The Federal Rules of Evidence that control every federal case (civil and criminal) throughout the land, are printed in the Thomson-West edition of the Rules of Court on only 13 pages! Believe it or not.

That's 13 pages between you and success or defeat!

It isn't difficult, but you must know HOW TO USE THE RULES and what the rules mean by relevant, reliable, competent, privileged, etc.




The Dragonater has completed the Jurisdictionary course. It does not cover traffic court nor criminal court. It's mainly about suing as a plantiff in civil court.

But it's all good homie.

Monday, April 18, 2011

KPD pedophile cop arrested for death threats to prosecutor


Greg Isaacs survived his drunken assault of The Dragonater's spouse

Former KPD officer accused of threatening prosecutor in Facebook posts

KNOXVILLE, TENN. -- A former Knoxville Police Department officer who confessed to plying teenage girls with booze is now accused of threatening a prosecutor as part of a holy war with “the true mission of death.”

“Everything I do, I do it for your (sic) Lord and to carry out the true mission of death,” Donald Scott Clark wrote on a Facebook posting.

Clark was arrested at his Maynardville home Friday night by a small army of officers responding to what authorities allege was a threat to the life of Knox County Assistant District Attorney General Steve Sword. Clark is charged with the rarely cited offense of retaliation for past action, which makes it a felony to threaten a witness or judicial official engaged in carrying out the business of justice.

Contacted Sunday, Sword said he could not discuss the specific threat made against him.

“I appreciate the work of the Knox County Sheriff’s Office and Knoxville Police Department in protecting me and my family,” said Sword, a married father of young children who specializes in prosecuting crimes against children.

Sword was not seeking to jail Clark when Clark and then-fellow KPD Officer Nicky Ray Bryant pleaded guilty earlier this year to a misdemeanor charge of plying two 13-year-old girls with booze. Instead, Sword agreed to allow Clark and Bryant to be placed on probation. Both already had lost their jobs.

However, at a hearing earlier this month, defense attorney Gregory P. Isaacs sought for Clark judicial diversion, a move that would allow him to ask that his record be wiped clean if he complies with the terms of his probation. Sword balked, and Criminal Court Judge Bob McGee delayed a ruling to allow Sword time to present more evidence.

Clark then lashed out at Sword in a series of Facebook posts obtained by the News Sentinel this weekend. While Clark’s Facebook rant does not constitute the entirety of the evidence on which the retaliation charge was based, it is cited in court records as part of the foundation of the case.

Isaacs on Sunday termed Clark’s Facebook posts the ramblings of a drug-addled ex-cop rather than a credible threat against Sword.

“Scott Clark did not intend to threaten or harm any individual,” Isaacs said. “His comments on his private Facebook page are confidential and private, much like a diary. These random thoughts, influenced by prescription medication such as (sleep medicine) Ambien, do not rise to the level of a viable threat.”

In a series of Facebook posts, Clark wrote that the “first stage” of his holy war was “already in effect.”

“God forgive me for what I had to do,” he wrote. “You started this, Steve Sword. Unfortunately, to truly fight evil, one must become evil.”

In another posting dated one day after his hearing in McGee’s court, Clark wrote, “For Thomas Jefferson stated, ‘The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with fresh blood.’ ”

A day later, he wrote: “I’ll turn the other cheek when I send them all to their graves. Oh, God, I pray you … forget (sic) me now for what I am now forced to do.”

Clark also offered up on Facebook what he called “Plan B.”

“I just kill everyone,” he wrote.

Clark is free on $5,000 bond.

Comments

Warning about Ambien. It can really mess you up. Ask Congressmen Kennedy in the loonybin.

Can no one see the true repentance that is so evident in the eyes of the poor defendant AND the total humility represented by the sack cloth and ashes pin stripes worn by his morally superior attorney?

Holy Cow. Greg Isaacs looks like he's getting ready for a meeting with the five families.

So Facebook is confidential and private? When did this happen?

Isaacs needs socks on those nasty feet.

Police instructor kidnaps women, hunts them, kills them


The Most Dangerous Game with Dick Cheney

The Most Dangerous Game with Robert Hansen

Robert Hansen, a serial killer who was active in the early 1980s, would kidnap women and then release them in the Knik River Valley in Alaska. He would then hunt them, armed with a knife and a Ruger Mini-14 rifle. He worked as an assistant drill instructor at a police academy in Pocahontas, Iowa. He even broke several records, documented in the Pope & Young's book of world hunting records. On June 13, 1983, 17 year old Cindy Paulson went to the police after escaping from the cockpit of Hansen's Piper Super Cub, a set of handcuffs still dangling from one wrist. She told police that she had been offered $200 to pose for pictures before being abducted, raped, and sexually assaulted with the wooden handle of a hammer. She stated that she had worked one cuff loose, then fled on foot from the airplane's cockpit when Hansen was distracted while loading supplies. She claimed to have eluded Hansen until she was picked up by a passing truck on a nearby road and taken to the police. Supported by Paulson's testimony, Flothe and the police secured a warrant and searched Hansen's house on October 27, 1983, uncovering jewelry belonging to the victims, newspaper clippings about the murders and an array of firearms — including a semi-automatic .223-caliber Ruger Mini-14 rifle. They theorized that he began killing prostitutes around 1979. After paying a woman for her services, he would kidnap, torture, and rape her. He would then bind her and fly her out to his cabin in the Knik River Valley in his private airplane. Once he had found a suitably desolate location, he would release his victim on a river sandbar, stalk her and then kill her with a hunting knife or the Ruger carbine as she fled through the woods. When ballistics tests returned a match between bullets found at the crime scenes and Hansen's rifle, he entered into a plea bargain. He pled guilty to the four homicides the police knew about and provided details about his other victims in return for serving his sentence in a federal prison along with no publicity in the press. He confirmed the police theory of how the women were abducted, adding that he would sometimes let a potential victim go if she convinced him that she wouldn't report him to police, and indicated that he began killing as early as 1973. He showed investigators 17 gravesites in the Knik River Valley, 12 of which were unknown to the police. 11 remains of a probable 21 victims were exhumed by the police and returned to their families.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Most_Dangerous_Game

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Target_(Dollhouse)

Dick Cheney's Dollhouse

Given his many mishaps, I was in a charitable mood when I went to hear the man speak on Monday. He looked positively rosy, well-fed and had virtually no wrinkles on his face, even at close range. The cares that someone like him ought to have were not reflected in Dick Cheney's face.


Psychopaths don't have lines on their face, because they have no emotions to express. They also have no problem sleeping because they never have dreams nor nightmares.









Motorcycle Mecca Massacre



Tellico Fish Camp Collides with Biker Documentary

Tulli Cole
Monroe County Buzz
April 15, 2011

TELLICO PLAINS, TENN. -- The Tellico Fish Camp is a relatively new restaurant in Tellico Plains. Located at 1035 Mecca Pike, and sporting a rustic, comfortable look, the café serves up burgers, chicken salads, and soups, as well as its titular “southern-style” catfish and hospitality.

And after an exciting evening on April 6, it may just have to add a side-helping of leftover stardust to the menu.

It may not be too much of a stretch of the imagination to say that owner Trish Etheredge had no idea what was in store for her or her staff when she met John Powell.

However, that fateful meeting opened up a door to a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity.

Powell and his wife, Charlene, own the Iron Horse motorcycle resort in Stecoah, North Carolina, and they discovered the Fish Camp while on a trip along the beautiful Skyway. Though it was not yet open, Powell was impressed with the would-be restaurant, and he sorely wanted to eat there one day. He carried this wish with him back home, and soon shared it with a good friend of his: Frank Iratkovic.

Iratkovic just so happens to head a small production company called Ten + Me. Having already participated in a few shows involving motorcycle repairs and enhancements, Iratkovic dreamed of filming something a little different, something that illustrated the love regular people have for riding motorcycles.

That something transformed into a possible pilot for a documentary. It would catalogue the journey of a group of Illinois bikers who would travel across the United States for Route 66 and California, stopping to eat at interesting diners and meet new people along the way.

And when he heard about the Fish Camp, Iratkovic just knew it had to be one of those many stops. He called up Etheredge and asked her if she would be at all willing to host his crew.

“And I said, ‘Sure!’,” said Etheredge, with a laugh, while recounting the tale.

A date was set, and the Fish Camp family prepared for the upcoming visit.

At first, there was some doubt as to whether or not the bikers would ever reach the Fish Camp. A late arrival the previous night and foul weather prevented them from leaving the Iron Horse on Monday, the 4th, and still more delays made them late on the following Wednesday.

But at 6:15 that evening, the ragtag group of men and women, both young and not-so-old, finally rumbled into the restaurant parking lot like a rattling boom of thunder. A camera crew followed close behind, one man hanging precariously out the window of the car as he filmed the caravan’s arrival.

The twelve bikers and three crewmen were starving, and so the staff of the Fish Camp jumped into action and welcomed the friendly “Yanks” with open arms. They led the newcomers into the dining area, seated them, and quickly took orders, all the while dodging and weaving through two cameras, mingling bikers, and a low-hanging boom microphone.

While the bikers rested and relaxed, the cameramen wandered the restaurant, filming whatever caught their eye. They peeked into the famous “bucket-sink” bathrooms, interviewed both the bikers and Etheredge herself, zoomed in on the laughter and conversations bubbling at the main table, and even captured a few shots of a fresh plate of catfish. There was hardly a moment the cameras were not rolling; the crewmen only took a break to fill their rumbling guts, and then swiftly returned to filming the action.

It was all very impressive. However, still more impressive was the staff of the Fish Camp itself. As mentioned before, the crew was late in coming to the restaurant. But the staff waited patiently, and when their visitors did arrive, they did not hesitate or stumble; they jumped immediately into action, and worked hard to ensure the Illinois guests felt at home and comfortable. Waitresses Sandy Walker and Greta Harris served fifteen folks at once, and some others besides, and were quick to make sure each and every order was correct.

Andrew Harris—filling in for regular chef Roy Hawkins—cooked steaming meals both for hungry stomachs and cameras. Trish Etheredge was a wonderful hostess, helping where and when she was needed, whether it was on the frontlines or in the hot kitchen. Everyone played their part and gave over a hundred percent. It was no wonder that, when asked if they had enjoyed their meal, the bikers and crewmen gave a resounding and enthusiastic, “YES!”

If anyone deserved to take part in a documentary, and be featured in a “farewell” segment when the caravan rolled out after 8 p.m., it was the staff of the Tellico Fish Camp.

So when will this pilot air, and where? There are at least three channels Ten + Me is bidding for: HBO, The Learning Channel, and the Discovery Channel. However, the company is yearning for HBO. As for the premier, that may come as soon as fall rolls around.

And what’s next for the Tellico Fish Camp? Right now they are open Friday thru Monday 11 a.m. until 9 p.m. but starting May 1, the Fish Camp will be open six days a week. Etheredge wishes to remind any other would-be guests that, “We are an alcohol-free, family friendly restaurant.”

"One girl lost a foot, she is a comptroller for a local beer dist. co. another guy lost both legs, both still in crit. care. The driver was drinking, He jumped out of his truck and started yelling that the bikes hit him and was promply decked and knocked out. The other guy in the truck took off running across a field and was chased down and had the **** beat out of him."
-ETR, Several Bikes and Truck collide





Video: Truck, multiple motorcycles involved in crash

WBIR TV
April 17, 2011

TELLICO PLAINS, TENN. -- Eight people were sent to area hospitals Sunday following a crash in Monroe County involving a pickup truck and six motorcycles.

Investigators say the crash happened just before 5 PM on Mecca Pike near the McMinn County line.

Six motorcyclists, along with two people who were inside the truck were injured.

Authorities say there were some broken bones, but none of the injuries were life-threatening.

The motorcyclists were taking part in a memorial ride at the time of the incident.

Details surrounding the cause of the crash have not yet been released.

Comments

AS A fellow rider and family to two of the riders involved, this is a shame. people need to get off of the phones, slow down, and pay attention to others around them while on the road. This was A terrible thing that could have been avoided if just a little care was used. WATCH FOR MOTORCYCLES!!!!!!!!!!

My family was the first bike they hit, J and S O

Please keep my Brother and Sister-in- law in your prayers. They will have a long road ahead of them to recover. This accident will change their lives forever. I hope the driver of the truck gets what he deserves.






Related News -- Jeff McWaters Memorial Ride was that same week in 2011, riding the Deals Gap Dragon and Tellico Dragon in Monroe County...

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Here's your body bag


THE KILL TEAM - Following the routine Army procedure required after every 'battlefield' murder, the soldiers cut off the dead boy’s clothes and stripped him naked to check for identifying tattoos. Here they are shown scanning his iris and fingerprints, using a portable biometric scanner.

Learning To Wear A Paper Bag

By James Baxter, President
National Motorists Association

Apparently, wearing a paper bag, or some other disguise, is the only way drivers and passengers will be able to maintain their anonymity, and a little privacy, as they cruise the roadways of America. At least that’s what is in store for us as “Real ID” reaches full bloom, and the states move forward on implementation.

Florida, one of the early adopters of Real ID requirements, is on the cusp of implementing a full blown 24-7 universal government operated surveillance system that will monitor and track any person who ventures beyond the confines of their residence. I hasten to add that there are no public initiatives, at this time, to place surveillance devices in private homes. Before that would be attempted it will be necessary for the public to become accustomed to cameras on most roadways and intersections, unfortunately, a process that is well underway.

The heart of the Florida program, the key building block, is the digital image of faces currently applied to drivers licenses and state I.D. cards. Cameras, stationary and mobile, capture the faces of drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and any other target of interest and those images are immediately passed to a central database that identifies the person, and gathers all recorded information on that person (e.g. Social Security number, criminal record, civil court activity, licenses, permits, registrations, and any other information accumulated by public agencies). This entire task can be completed and the information relayed back to curious public servants, and private contractors, in a claimed 0.04 seconds.

It’s hard to believe that this can be done so quickly, when it can take weeks or months for the same public agencies to respond to a citizen request for public information?

Right now, it appears the only defenses against this kind surveillance and monitoring, are the foregoing of licenses and I.D. cards, extremely impractical, always wearing a paper bag or mask when in public, again not very practical, or perhaps, just perhaps, telling our elected representatives that we don’t want to live under this kind of Orwellian regime.

See also:

Future Traffic Cops of Amerika: The Kill Team - Motorcycle Kill - Sarah Palin's buddy pled guilty to mass murder, sentenced to 25 years in prison


The Kill Team: Sarah Palin's buddy pled guilty to mass murder


The Kill Team: Sarah Palin's buddy in Nazi helmet pled guilty to mass murder

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

ETR Pussy



The Constitutional RIGHT to Travel

"WAY too many people do NOT see it as a personal responsibility, so I would MUCH rather be inconvenienced and have 2 minutes of my "freedom" taken away so that those that don't feel the same can be caught."
-Slick, ETR forum, Police check on 129 today

"I think that most folks fail to understand that operating a Motor Vehicle on our roadways is a Priveledge and not a right. I'm in favor of Road Blocks and Safety Checks, but I think it needs to be done at different times of the day though. PS: And no I'm not a Cop, but I have the upmost respect for them."
-Mountain Road Madness, ETR forum, Police check on 129 today


Is there really a human being this STOOPID? The ETR Police State Forum seems to be fool of them... Enjoy your 30 MPH "speed limit" on the Dragon that quadrupled the death rate, gaterape gamma ray naked body scanners at McGhee Tyson Airport, fully nude body-cavity searches on public highways during traffic stops, 0.00% Blood Alcohol "Legal Limit" for ALL adults, and Sheriff Berrong peeping through your walls with X-ray glasses...suckers!

"I’ll burn your house down, set your dog on fire and there won’t be a member of your family left, do you understand me? I won’t hire it done, I will do it myself! Do you understand me?”
-Deals Gap Blount County sheriff James Berrong threatening to murder his secretary, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Nuchols v. Berrong, No. 04-5645, July 11, 2005


Will They get their dying wish...?















"Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
-Famous Old Dead Guy



The Kill Team: Sarah Palin's buddy pled guilty to mass murder


The Kill Team: Sarah Palin's buddy in Nazi helmet pled guilty to mass murder, sentenced to 25 years in prison

Future Traffic Cops of Amerika: The Kill Team - Motorcycle Kill - Sarah Palin's buddy pled guilty to mass murder



6 year old girl gateraped then drug tested by TSA:










OR...

Police Officer Jack McLamb and US Supreme Court say YOU have a Constitutional Right to Travel without a driver license internal passport, which denies cops jurisdiction to make traffic stops for breach of civil contract. Georgia Right To Travel Act to ban driver license contracts and ban traffic tickets in 2010.

BTW the "legal limit" for all persons in all states is 0.00% BAC, as confessed by THP in the TN Driver License Handbook. Or didn't YOU read that?

BTW THP sold fake I.D. "driver CERTIFICATES" to 400,000 illegal aliens, marked "NOT VALID FOR IDENTIFICATION", since illegal aliens are not required to have a "driver LICENSE". 50-million illegal aliens are given immunity from arrest and deportation by the Illegal Alien-In-Chief.




R.I. Lawmaker Bill to Outlaw DUI Checkpoints

PROVIDENCE, R.I.—A Rhode Island state lawmaker says drunk-driving checkpoints are unfair and should be banned.

Rep. Charlene Lima, a Cranston Democrat, has introduced a bill in the General Assembly to prohibit police from conducting traffic checkpoints to identify drunk drivers. A legislative panel reviewed the legislation Wednesday.

Lima says she supports laws against drunk driving, but that checkpoints "smack of a police state." She said there's no reason sober drivers should have to prove to police that they're not driving drunk.






TSA, DHS plan massive rollout of mobile surveillance vans with long-distance X-ray capability, eye movement tracking and more

Newly-released documents obtained by the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) reveal that the US Depart of Homeland Security has been working on plans to roll out a new wave of mobile surveillance technologies at train stations, stadiums and streets. These new technologies will track your eye movements, capture and record your facial dimensions for face-recognition processing, bathe you in X-rays to look under your clothes, and even image your naked body using whole-body infrared images that were banned from consumer video cameras because they allowed the camera owners to take "nude" videos of people at the beach.

Most importantly, many of these technologies are designed to be completely hidden, allowing the government to implement "covert inspection of moving subjects." You could be walking down a hallway at a sports stadium, in other words, never knowing that you're being bathed in X-rays from the Department of Homeland Security, whose operators are covertly looking under your clothes to see if you're carrying any weapons.

Roving vans to "track eye movements"

According to a Forbes.com article (http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenbe...), one project pursued by DHS using technology from Siemens would "mount backscatter x-ray scanners and video cameras on roving vans, along with other cameras on buildings and utility poles, to monitor groups of pedestrians, assess what they carried, and even track their eye movements."

Another project involved developing "a system of long range x-ray scanning to determine what metal objects an individual might have on his or her body at distances up to thirty feet."

We already know that the U.S. government has purchased 500 vans using covert backscatter technology to covertly scan people on the streets. They're called "Z Backscatter Vans, or ZBVs."
http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2010/08/24/full-body-scan-technology-deployed-in-street-roving-vans/

This is all part of the U.S. government's new wave of police state surveillance that aims to track and irradiate innocent civilians who have committed no crime. Under the new Janet Napolitano regime, all Americans are now considered potential terrorists, and anyone can be subjected to government-sanctioned radiation scanning at any time, without their knowledge or approval.

And don't think these efforts will be limited merely to backscatter technology: The TSA is now testing full-power, deep-penetrating X-ray machines (like the ones that deliver chest X-rays in hospitals) in order to check people for bombs they may have swallowed. Yes, Janet Napolitano now wants to look inside your colon! And they're willing to X-ray everyone -- without their consent -- in order to do that.

Read the documents yourself

If you have trouble believing the U.S. government is unleashing a new wave of police state covert scanning vans on to the streets of America, you can read the documents yourself -- all 173 pages. They're available on the EPIC website at: http://epic.org/privacy/body_scanners/EPIC_Body_Scan_FOIA_Docs_Feb_2011.pdf

EPIC calls these vans "mobile strip search devices" because they give the federal government technology to look under your clothes without your permission or consent. It's also being done without probable cause, so it's a violation of the Fourth Amendment protections that are guaranteed to Americans under the Bill of Rights.

"It's a clear violation of the fourth amendment that's very invasive, not necessarily effective, and poses all the same radiation risks as the airport scans," said EPIC attorney Ginger McCall, in the Forbes article (above).

Huge health risks to the population

It's not just the privacy issues that raise red flags here, of course: It's also the fact that the U.S. government has no respect whatsoever for the health of its citizens who are being subjected to these radiation emitting devices. Even while the TSA refuses to release testing results from its own naked body scanners, DHS keeps buying more machines (and more powerful machines) that will only subject travelers to yet more radiation.

As we've already reported here on NaturalNews.com, numerous scientists are already on the record warning that the TSA's backscatter "naked body scanners" could cause breast cancer, sperm mutation and other health problems.
http://www.naturalnews.com/030607_naked_body_scanners_radiation.html

But the U.S. government doesn't seem to care what happens to your health. Their position is that their "right" to know what you're carrying under your clothes or inside your body overrides your right to privacy or personal health. All they have to do is float a couple of fabricated terrorism scare stories every few months, and then use those "threats" as justification for violating the Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens are very turn.

The real question in all this, of course, is how far will this go? The TSA is already reaching down your pants and feeling up peoples' genitals as part of the "security" measures. Will DHS soon just start subjecting people to body cavity searches as a necessary security requirement before entering a football stadium, for example? Will Americans now be X-rayed with cancer-causing ionizing radiation -- without their awareness or consent -- merely because they are walking down the street or boarding a train?

That seems to be the case. And as you can readily tell from all this, it's getting harder and harder for the fast-dwindling group of deniers to claim America isn't already a police state. The USA is fast becoming a high-tech version of the very worst police state tyrannies witnessed throughout human history. The only difference is that now they have "science" on their side with the coolest new technology that can violate your rights and irradiate your body in a hundred different ways, with high-resolution images and digital storage devices.

I suppose if all this were being done to really stop international terrorists, that might be one thing. But what has become increasingly clear in observing the government's behavior in this realm is that the U.S. government now considers Americans to be the enemy -- especially those who have the gall to defend their Constitutionally-protected freedoms or question the unjustified centralization of power taking place right now in Washington.

The DHS is America's new secret police. And their cameras are pointing inward, into the everyday lives of Americans; not outward, aimed at international terrorists.

When the price of security becomes forfeiting your liberty, the source of the "terror" is no longer the terrorists but your own government. Isn't this the lesson that history has taught us well?

Watch the talk by Naomi Wolf, who explains all this extremely well:
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=EEE6C7A46FA0A552EAB819EB4693210A
http://naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=176F565D8E528E3AEDC7A28A18CBAD63

This video will open your eyes to what's really happening today. It has all happened before in recent history, and the patterns are undeniable. Watch the videos to learn more.



"Police officers are more likely to murder you or rape you or sexually assualt you than citizens."
-Barry Cooper, DEA agent, DontGetBusted.com, MP3 radio broadcast

"The US Supreme Court said in Miranda that there's 40,000 police jurisdictions in America. We expect one civil rights crime in every one of those agencies every day. 40,000 times 365 days a year is 14,600,000 crimes committed by police every year. Hell, there's only 14,200,000 crimes committed by the criminals. The police commit more crimes against the People than the criminals commit!"
-George Gordon Radio Show, The Policeman Is Not Your Friend, He Is Your Adversary

"10% of cops are honest, 10% are dishonest, and 80% wish they were honest."
-Detective Frank Serpico NYPD, Knapp Commission

"I’ll burn your house down, set your dog on fire and there won’t be a member of your family left, do you understand me? I won’t hire it done, I will do it myself! Do you understand me?”
-Deals Gap Blount County sheriff James Berrong, United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit, Nuchols v. Berrong, No. 04-5645, July 11, 2005

Tortured by Cops in TN - Waterboarding, Baseball Bat, Gun in the Mouth Inside Your Own Home, to Extort Signature on "Consent to Search" Contract

COP.
2. to steal; filch. 3. to buy (narcotics). 4. cop out, a. to avoid one's responsibility, the fulfillment of a promise, etc.; renege; back out. 5. cop a plea, a. to plead guilty or confess in return for receiving a lighter sentence. b. to plead guilty to a lesser charge; plea-bargain.
-Random House Unabridged Dictionary







THX 1138 Social Control MP3

"Those who give up liberty for security shall receive neither."
-Old Ben Franklin

Monday, April 11, 2011

Nazi FIA to ban food, jobs, travel for NWO



Megacities on the move – Planned-opolis from Forum for the Future on Vimeo.

Funded by corporations such as Bank of America, the City of London Corporation, PepsiCo UK, Time Warner, Royal Dutch Shell, Vodafone, and FIA World Motorsports Tax Avoidance Foundation On $500-Million Stolen From McLaren And Ferarri Racing Teams To Rent Nazi Hookers, Forum for the Future envisions scenarios for cities in 2040.

No, this is not a sarcastic video. It is a real, serious scenario.

To sum up:

Food and water is regulated and rationed by a “Global Food Council” which seizes total control over farming. Meat is a rare treat only to be enjoyed on special occasions.

The state decides what your job will be with “designated career announcements,” nobody has the choice to decide their own vocation.

Movement and behavior is controlled by a calorie credit card linked to a smart phone that rations the amount of travel the citizens of planned-opolis, are allowed to make. Private ownership of cars will be banned for non-elitists because, “the state knows they just aren’t practical anymore.”

“It makes so much sense doesn’t it,” insists the smiley faced slave “Vee,” who enjoys the fact that she can “switch off brain and go to work,” adding, “With this many people around I’m glad there’s a mega-computer in charge.”

those who resist and still cling to some semblance of freedom in defiance of the state and the super-computers running the slave grid, there’s the “cry freedom ghetto,” prison camps for malcontents who are blocked from getting jobs, accessing high speed transport or the Internet.

Other scenarios conceived by Forum for the Future are slightly different but they all have common threads: drastic reduction of rights, privileges and freedoms; constant reference to “an elite” having exclusive rights on cars and other luxuries; state controlling all aspects of life.

A New World Order is not a conspiracy theory, THEY are selling it to you as we speak.












Megacities on the Move

ForumForTheFuture.org
Date: 2 Dec 2010

For the first time in history more than half the world’s population is living in towns and cities. We passed this milestone in 2008 and by 2040 two in three people are expected to live in urban environments.

Urbanisation presents us with a wealth of new opportunities and huge challenges. It has the potential to further economic development and innovation, but also threatens to exacerbate key global problems, including resource depletion, climate change, and inequality.

Megacities on the move sets out to find solutions to one of the biggest challenges – how billions of city-dwellers can access what they need without putting intolerable strains on the planet. It focuses on how to achieve sustainable urban mobility, looking at all the ways in which people will access goods, services and information and make contact with each other. It goes beyond transport to consider ICT solutions, innovative urban design and much more.

Forum for the Future, working in partnership with Vodafone and the FIA Foundation, who funded the project, and with EMBARQ, has produced a practical toolkit to help public bodies, companies and civil society organisations understand and plan for the mobility challenges of the future. It is designed to encourage action now and stimulate innovative products and services.

We have created four scenarios exploring urban mobility in the year 2040, taking into account resource shortages, climate change, demographic trends and other major factors which will shape our future, and drawing on interviews with more than 40 experts from around the world.

We chose this year because urban infrastructure is generally planned, built and used over decades. Looking at the challenges we may face in 30 years provides enough time to plan for and deliver a whole new generation of more sustainable solutions.

You can download the toolkit as one document or in the separate sections below.

Forum for the Future’s scenarios are not predictions or depictions of desirable futures which we wish to promote, and they do not represent our vision of a sustainable future. They are pictures of different possible futures, designed to help people understand the major trends that are shaping our world. They aim to challenge, inspire and excite, so that people feel motivated to plan for a better, more sustainable future.

Understanding the issues

You can use this section to introduce your colleagues, business partners and clients to the issues. It explains why it is important to start planning for the future and reviews the major factors which will shape the world in the next 30 years, exploring how they will affect urban mobility. Click here to view this section of the report.

What’s your destination? Four scenarios for urban mobility in 2040

Want to explore what the future may hold and test your strategy? Our scenarios present four possible visions of urban mobility in the world of 2040. They are a tool to help understand what the future may hold for your organisation, and to plan ahead more effectively. Click here to view this section of the report.

We have brought the scenarios to life in four short, vivid and compelling animations. They follow a day in the life of an ordinary woman, examining the mobility challenges and solutions in each world.

What can you do? Six solutions for sustainable urban mobility

If you want to bring innovation into your strategic planning, here are actions you can take now to help create sustainable urban mobility systems. This section includes practical examples of how these solutions are already being put into practice around the world. Click here to view this section of the report.

Plan the future now: How to run a workshop using the scenarios

This section gives specific guidance on how to plan a workshop using the four scenarios. They show how you can use the scenarios to explore future urban mobility issues relevant to you, and develop more sustainable products, services and strategies. Click here to view this section of the report.

Chris Dewey, Associate
Rupert Fausset, Principal Strategic Advisor
Ivana Gazibara, Senior Strategic Advisor
James Goodman, Head of Futures
Peter Madden, CEO

Contact

For more information about the project, or if you would like assistance using the scenarios, please contact Ivana Gazibara, megacitiesonthemove@forumforthefuture.org, +44 (0)207 324 3673

See also:

Eco Nazis ban vehicles from towns and cities





FIA presidente Max Mosley is the son of the founder of the British Fascist Party, Sir Oswald Mosley, jailed in a sex dungeon in World War 2. Max Hooker was paid $2-million for having sex with 5 Nazi porn stars.

FIA Foundation

The FIA Foundation is an independent UK registered charity which manages and supports an international programme of activities promoting road safety, environmental protection and sustainable mobility, as well as funding specialist motor sport safety research.

The FIA Foundation was established in 2001 with a donation of $300 million made by the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA), the non-profit federation of motoring organisations and the governing body of world motor sport.

The FIA Foundation is an NGO in Roster Consultative Status with the Economic & Social Council of the United Nations and a regular participant in the Working Party on Traffic Safety and the World Forum on Harmonisation of Vehicle Standards at the UN Economic Commission for Europe, and is a leading participant in the UN Global Road Safety Collaboration. The Foundation works with a range of international agencies including the World Health Organisation (WHO), the World Bank and the UN Environment Programme on road safety and environmental issues.









Mosley's Win: 'No Nazis at the Orgy?'

Max Mosley, trustee of FIA Foundation and the son of Sir Oswald Mosley the 1930's British fascist leader, sought exemplary or punitive damages. He said his life was devastated after the newspaper alleged: "In public he rejects his father's evil past but secretly he plays Nazi sex games."

Mosley's background ensures that he won't get off that easily. His mother, Diana Mitford, was a celebrity British Nazi sympathizer in the prewar years, while his father, Sir Oswald Mosley, founded and led the British Union of Fascists — a guest of honor at their wedding in 1936, at the Berlin home of Joseph Goebbels, was none other than Adolf Hitler.

Mosley, one of the most powerful men in the multibillion-dollar sport of Grand Prix racing, admits to participating in the orgy, but denies that his fantasy had any Nazi or concentration-camp connotation. He spoke German, he said, simply because it was the native language of the women involved in the erotic rendezvous.

The News of the World's defense crumbled when Woman E, a prostitute married to an agent of MI5, Britain's domestic investigation service, failed to show up in court. Her lawyer cited her "emotional and mental state." She had filmed the 5-hr. orgy with a secret camera and had been interviewed for an article titled "Exclusive: Mosley Hooker Tells All: My Nazi Orgy With F1 Boss." She had been expected to testify that Mosley specifically asked the women to facilitate a Nazi-themed sex romp. The other four prostitutes, one of whom is a Ph.D. candidate, all denied that Mosley requested any Nazi elements.

In the week after the tabloid posted the footage online, traffic to its website increased by 600%, and 1.9 million people viewed the clip in which mock prison guards strip Mosley naked, inspect his head and genitals for lice and beat him with a whip. After being caned 21 times, Mosley begins to bleed and has to pause to apply a Band-Aid to his buttocks.

Max Mosley, President of the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA) since 1993 and a trustee of its charitable arm, the FIA Foundation, objected to the publication of an article in the News of the World newspaper. This article, headed 'F1 BOSS HAS SICK NAZI ORGY WITH 5 HOOKERS', was billed as an exclusive and ran under the subheading "Son of Hitler-loving fascist in sex shame". The article in question concerned an event, described as a party by Mosley and as an orgy by the newspaper. The text was accompanied by images taken from clandestine video footage and a concealed camera at the event itself. A sequel, published the following month under the banner "EXCLUSIVE: MOSLEY HOOKER TELLS ALL: MY NAZI ORGY WITH F1 BOSS", was mainly a purported interview with one of the women who participated in the event, who had filmed it with a camera supplied by the newspaper and concealed in her brassiere.

Mosley alleged breach of his of privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), seeking exemplary damages. He argued that the content of the published material was inherently private in nature and that there had existed a pre-existing relationship of confidentiality between the participants. The public display of this private event was thus unlawful.

Eady J, awarding a new UK record sum of £60,000 damages, agreed. In his 236-paragraph judgment he said as follows:

* The clandestine recording of sexual activity on private property was a proper subject-matter for the engagement of Article 8 of the ECHR.

* The woman with the concealed camera had committed an "old fashioned breach of confidence" as well as a violation of Article 8 of the ECHR.

* Mosley had a reasonable expectation of privacy in relation to his sexual activities, albeit unconventional, carried on between consenting adults on private property.

* There was no evidence that the event was intended to be an enactment of Nazi behaviour or adoption of any of its attitudes; nor indeed was it so. There was some bondage, beating and domination which seemed to be typical of sado-masochistic (S and M) behaviour -- but there was no public interest or other justification for the clandestine recording, for the publication of the resulting information and still photographs, or indeed for the placing of the video extracts on the News of the World website.

* The mere fact that this behaviour was viewed by some people with distaste and moral disapproval gave no justification for the intrusion on Mosley's personal privacy in the light of modern rights-based jurisprudence.

* Exemplary damages were not available in a claim for infringement of privacy.
This decision has been criticised in many quarters as destroying the ability of the UK press to reveal the shady facets of publicly prominent figures, suggesting that revelations of the pecadillos of politicians might now go unannounced. The IPKat wonders whether this criticism is founded on the assumption that we might be kept in the dark as to significant information that would cause the electorate to lose confidence in its leaders. If so, it seems that the countervailing public interest is also protected under the ECHR and we have -- at least in theory -- nothing to worry about. In this case, nothing turns on whether Max Mosley attends orgies, keeps sheep in his living room or eats prunes for breakfast and the decision looks right. We have all become habituated, indeed well-nigh addicted, to a constant flow of personal information concerning so-called celebrities; perhaps we should ask ourselves why this is so.

Merpel wants to know this: presumably each revelation by the News of the World brought attention and an increase in advertising revenue and web-traffic. Even if it has to fork out £60,000 plus an estimated £830,000 in costs, it must surely have profited pretty healthily from this escapade. Can anyone confirm this?

So police are now banned from undercover videos of criminal activity, due to embarrassment and violation of privacy of the criminals.

Judge Mad Max for yourself: